· Private foundation
The Cjb Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $237k
- $250k+12 grants · $15M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD T | $3,345,559 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENT CHAR GIFT FD LO | $3,345,559 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENT CHAR GIFT FD RU | $3,345,559 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD T | $948,664 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENT CHAR GIFT FD LO | $948,664 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENT CHAR GIFT FD RU | $948,664 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $773,795 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $450,000 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $372,760 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $333,918 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $299,778 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $275,814 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $236,937 |
| BRIGADE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $25,000 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR GIFT FD C | $6,757 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF CAMP KIRKWOOD INC2× · 2021–2022 · $250k · revenue +66% · 59% of their budget
- NINourishNC Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $210k · revenue +114%
- JAJo Ann Carter Harrelson Center Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $120k · revenue +140%
Funded once
- LPLakeside Partners of Wilmington Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $167k · revenue +53%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +46%
- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of Southeastern North Carolina Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +317%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Public/private collaborative to plant trees, raise awareness of the canopy, and educate about tree care.
Match mentoring volunteers with children in need to build and foster relationships.
To advocate for the health of all North Carolinians by pursuing equitable and collaborative solutions that address climate change and air pollution.
Dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
To enhance and advocate for Mill Ridge Park to strengthen the community of Southeast Davidson County.
To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.
The Wireless Research Center is an independent, private nonprofit research center dedicated to applied research and engineering. Located in North Carolina's Research Triangle region, the WRC helps clients from around the world develop…
Rock Hill Development Corporation develops business parks, recruits and supports new businesses to the area, and assists in the revitalization of Rock Hill.
The Foundation is organized as a supporting organization to raise and preserve funds to be used to promote and extend the programming of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern North Carolina.
The mission of the Christian Community Caring Center, aka 4Cs Food Pantry, is to serve Christ by providing healthy, nutritious food to our neighbors in need in Eastern Pender County, NC.
Prior to dissolution on July 8, 2019, CCS sought to improve the health and quality of life of the patients it served by collaborating with patients, health care providers, hospitals, health departments, community partners, and departments…
The Foundation is organized to raise and preserve funds to be used to promote and extend the programming of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Carolina.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Southeastern North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Camp Kirkwood Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP KIRKWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds NourishNC Inc ↗
- Who funds Lakeside Partners of Wilmington Inc ↗
- Who funds Jo Ann Carter Harrelson Center Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Southeastern North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF OAKDALE CEMETERY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dhs Charitable Trust Uad May 21 1965 · Dan Cameron Family Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Myrtle and Rt Sinclair Jr Charitable Foundation Inc · Cape Fear Memorial Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Cjb Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cjb Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Cjb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.