Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

The Civil Justice Reform Group

To advance civil justice reform on a local, state, and national level, and to engage in any lawful acts or activities for which corporations may be organized under the District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
12
Organizations funded FY2023
8%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$55,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$927,500
Organizations funded a year
12 to 17
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
9
Total assets, FY2024
$1.7M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 8% of the organizations The Civil Justice Reform Group funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Crime & LegalCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving12$1.9M8%
FY202312$1.7M8%
FY202213$1.8M8%
FY202114$1.9M14%
FY202014$2.1M7%
FY201917$2.4M18%
FY201817$2.2M12%
FY201717$2.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$16MEducation$275kCommunity Improvement$170kPhilanthropy$70kPublic Benefit$63kCivil Rights$40kSocial Science$25k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NV
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 28 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

The Civil Justice Reform Group supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 8 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 26 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Tort Reform Association: $8,877,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetLawyers for Civil Justice: $2,010,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetPennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform: $930,900 over 8y, 29% of budgetNew Jersey Civil Justice Reform Institute Inc: $735,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetIllinois Civil Justice League: $680,416 over 6y, 72% of budgetNew York Civil Justice Institute Inc: $457,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetTexans for Lawsuit Reform: $387,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetCivil Justice Association of California: $370,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetMissouri Civil Justice Reform Coalition Inc: $335,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetColorado Civil Justice League: $286,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetGeorge Mason University Foundation Inc: $275,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWashington Legal Foundation: $180,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetDue Process Institute: $140,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetThe National Judicial College: $110,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLouisiana Association of Business and Industry: $90,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUS Chamber Litigation Center: $80,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Center for Jurisprudence Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 78% of budgetBusiness & Industry Political Education Committee: $42,500 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetThe Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGeorgians for Lawsuit Reform Inc: $33,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNational Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Death Penalty Litigation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCenter for Democracy and Technology: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Tort Reform Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetMississippi Civil Justice Alliance Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetLiability Reform Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Civil Justice Reform Group with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Civil Justice Reform Group?

Find your warmest path to The Civil Justice Reform Group through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Civil Justice Reform Group

How much does The Civil Justice Reform Group give?
The Civil Justice Reform Group reported 12 grants totaling $1,878,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 17 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Civil Justice Reform Group fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (96%), Education (2%), Community Improvement (1%).
Who are The Civil Justice Reform Group's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: American Tort Reform Association ($8.9M), Lawyers for Civil Justice ($2.0M), Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform ($931k).
Does The Civil Justice Reform Group fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Civil Justice Reform Group?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Civil Justice Reform Group based?
The Civil Justice Reform Group is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Civil Justice Reform Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph