Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cissell Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2018
12
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$1k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of The Cissell Family Charitable Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to The Greater Cincinnati Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Cissell Family Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $3k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
6
’18
8
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$51kArts & Culture$12kEducation$5kHealth$500Public Safety & Disaster$300Environment$300Recreation & Sports$200International$100Other$0
02FY2018 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$1,000
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$500
THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$300
CINCINNATI PLAYHOUSE IN PARK$300
CINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE CO$250
ENSEMBLE THEATRE CINCINNATI$250
EVANS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$250
CINCINNATI POLICE HISTORICAL$200
GREAT PARKS FOUNDATION$100
THE CARTER CENTER$100
THE CRU FOUNDATION$100
CANCER FAMILY CARE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CRU FOUNDATION: $100 → 13%ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $150 → 17%THE CARTER CENTER: $100 → 14%CANCER FAMILY CARE: $100 → 16%EVANS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $250 → 14%THE CRU FOUNDATION: $100 → 13%GREAT PARKS FOUNDATION: $300 → 16%EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%GREAT PARKS FOUNDATION: $100 → 16%GREAT PARKS FOUNDATION: $100 → 16%ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $750 → 16%ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 16%ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 16%XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%CINCINNATI PLAYHOUSE IN THE PARK: $10k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $9k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $587 → 16%ENSEMBLE THEATER: $300 → 16%CINCINNATI PLAYHOUSE IN PARK: $300 → 16%CINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE CO: $250 → 16%CINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE CO: $250 → 16%CINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $250 → 16%ENSEMBLE THEATRE CINCINNATI: $250 → 16%CINCINNATI POLICE HISTORICAL: $200 → 16%CINCINNATI POLICE HISTORICAL: $100 → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $100 → 16%CINCINNATI BAR FOUNDATION: $75 → 16%CINCINNATI PLAYHOUSE IN PARK: $50 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 8 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$17k
$250

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+56%

Still filing today

25%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park
    3× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue -5%
  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • SX
    ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $2k

Funded once

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati

The mission of The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati (TCT) is to educate, entertain and engage audiences of all ages through professional theatrical productions and arts education programming. Our vision is to awaken a lifelong love of…

Arts & Culture
2
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
3
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
4
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
5
The Contemporary Arts Center

The CAC is a lab for understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us through the experience and creation of all contemporary art forms.

Arts & Culture
6
Cincinnati Public Radio Inc

Cincinnati Public Radio is the trusted, independent source of journalism, music and culture empowering a vibrant, engaged and informed community.

Arts & Culture
7
Classical Theatre Company

Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…

Arts & Culture
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Know Theatre of Cincinnati

Know Theatre is a small professional theatre showcasing voices, new works, & plays that embrace the inherent theatricality of the live experience. Know Theatre seeks to be a place where artists and audiences feel welcome to take artistic…

Arts & Culture
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
Cincinnati Arts Association

The Cincinnati Arts Association (CAA), a not-for-profit, was founded in 1990 to serve as a manager, presenter and educator. CAA's mission is to present a broad range of high quality performing and visual arts programs, develop diverse…

Arts & Culture
12
Cincinnati Scholarship Foundation

The mission of the organization is to connect students residing in greater cincinnati with post-high school scholarship opportunities to pursue their educational goals

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ensemble Theatre of Cincinnati; the most unlike its peers is Cancer Family Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $51,218 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $10,350 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Playhou…+3 more: $800 · Arts & Culture+3 moreST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $1,750 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $600 · OtherGREAT PARKS FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherCINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE CO: $500 · OtherCINCINNATI POLICE HISTORICAL: $300 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $250 · OtherTHE CRU FOUNDATION: $200 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $250 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 · HealthCancer Family Care Inc: $100 · HealthTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $100 · InternationalCincinnati Bar Foundation: $75 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$51,468Arts & Culture$11,150Other$4,200Education$2,750Health$250International$100Crime & Legal$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $51,218 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $10,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CLEVELAND: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Family Care Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Bar Foundation: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earthward Bound FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earthward Bound Foundation · William P Anderson Foundation Central Trust · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent · Millstone Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cissell Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cissell Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cissell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph