Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Circle Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$123kReligion$65kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$8kEnvironment$5kRecreation & Sports$3kHousing & Shelter$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY QUEEN OF PEACE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS$5,000
ST FRANCIS CABRINI$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MARY CULVER HOME$1,500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$225k · 7 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$225k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+89%

Still filing today

14%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2024 · $116k · revenue +51%
  • MQ
    MARY QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $42k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +17%
  • SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +143%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

2
Southeast Missouri Food Bank Inc

The mission of the southeast missouri food bank is to promote food recovery; acquire and distribute food and household products; and provide community leadership and education on issues of hunger and poverty in an effort to alleviate…

Food & Nutrition
3
St Mary's Foundation
Human Services
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

6
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
7
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
8
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

9
St Mary's Bank Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic applied liberal arts community that welcomes diverse spiritual traditions sponsored by the congregation of sisters of st agnes. marian university engages students in the education of the whole person. we…

Education
11
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
12
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Area Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Mary Culver Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARY QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC CHURCH — $42,000 · OtherMARY QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST FRANCIS CABRINI — $20,000 · OtherST FRANCIS CABRINIST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $6,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES — $5,500 · OtherTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,500 · Other+9 more — $15,800 · Other+9 moreMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $116,250 · EducationMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOLSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EnvironmentFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesCaritas Connections Inc — $1,000 · Food & NutritionJUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · International
Other$134,300Education$116,250Environment$5,000Human Services$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Recreation & Sports$1,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $116,250 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS
  • Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC
  • Who funds THE MARY CULVER HOME
  • Who funds Caritas Connections Inc
  • Who funds JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moneta Group Charitable FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Circle Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Circle Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Circle Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph