Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cigna Group Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4,075
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$540k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$21MEducation$14MHuman Services$11MFood & Nutrition$8.2MYouth Development$4.7MInternational$3.8MCommunity Improvement$2.8MPhilanthropy$2.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 4075 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3972 grants · $2.7M
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $589k
  • $50k–250k70 grants · $9.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.7M
$250
Median grant
1
States reached
$127M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$540,000
YMCA$333,333
AMERICAN RED CROSS$312,151
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$250,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$250,000
USVETS - ARIZONA$150,000
OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS$150,000
HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION$150,000
PRECINCT2GETHER INC$150,000
ST VINCENTS HOUSE (SVH)$150,000
TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL$150,000
THE HOMELESS COALITION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$150,000
OPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE$150,000
MCCALL FOUNDATION$150,000
ELUNA$150,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59M · 1494 repeat orgs$51M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

1494 repeat relationships: 1067 still active in FY2024, 427 since wound down; 119 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1494
383

Total granted

$59M
$44M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

9%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $805k · revenue +19%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $713k · revenue +43%
  • AI
    AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD
    5× · 2019–2023 · $485k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25M
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M
  • WC
    WE CHARITY
    one grant, 2019 · $350k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
3
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
4
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
7
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
8
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
9
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
10
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
11
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Philadelphia Delaware and Susquehanna Valley; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

162 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 162 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
158/162
Grantees still filing
119/162
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $25,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $3,755,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC+185 more: $41,481,781 · Other+185 moreBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $804,872 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROSES: $333,333 · Human ServicesBACK ON MY FEET: $317,676 · Human ServicesTHE BRASHEAR ASSOCIATION INC: $227,725 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $713,499 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $298,998 · HealthMaternity Care Coalition: $298,570 · HealthELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $147,777 · HealthAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $484,555 · InternationalICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $201,100 · EducationEducation Law Center - PA: $155,846 · EducationMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $128,715 · Food & Nutrition
Other$70,236,781Human Services$1,683,606Health$1,608,844International$484,555Education$356,946Food & Nutrition$128,715

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $804,872 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $713,499 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $484,555 over 5y, 24% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $333,333 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $317,676 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $298,998 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMaternity Care Coalition: $298,570 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BRASHEAR ASSOCIATION INC: $227,725 over 3y, 11% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $211,725 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $201,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEducation Law Center - PA: $155,846 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetVETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $147,777 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $128,715 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $125,100 over 3y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
  • Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA91.6× affinity102 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Connelly Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Independence Foundation · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cigna Group Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cigna Group Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cigna Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph