Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

C&P Levinsohn Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$375kRecreation & Sports$149kHuman Services$131kInternational$87kHealth$48kCivil Rights$25kPhilanthropy$16kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOL$50,000
COMMON GOAL USA INC$40,000
TEAM STEADY BUCKETS$40,000
ST LUKE'S SCHOOL$40,000
UNITED SOCCER COACHES ASSOCIATION$15,000
SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
CASA OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ATOOT INC: $5k → 12%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
IA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$761k · 17 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
20

Total granted

$761k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+57%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +60%
  • SC
    SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +67%
  • TQ
    THE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $106k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • BC
    BROOKLYN CITY FOOTBALL CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • AA
    ATHLETE ALLY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +11%
  • 5
    5150
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Soccer Stars Foundation

Soccer stars foundation was born out of the belief that every person, regardless of their cognitive and physical abilities and socio-economic status, should be able to play the greatest sport in the world. we strive to inspire teamwork,…

Youth Development
2
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
8
Usa Football Inc

Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…

Recreation & Sports
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sanneh Foundation and the most unlike its peers is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Lgbtq+ Community CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…South Asian Cultural and Sp…Land Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionJewish Community FederationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%32%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%56%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,730

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LUKE'S SCHOOL — $140,000 · EducationST LUKE'S SCHOOLTHE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $106,250 · EducationTHE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOLDUKE UNIVERSITY — $105,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE WASHINGTON MARKET SCHOOL INC — $18,500 · Education+1 more — $5,500 · EducationSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $130,000 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMMUNIT…+2 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesTeam Steady Buckets — $50,000 · OtherTeam Steady BucketsBEYOND SPORT LTD — $27,500 · OtherBEYOND SPORT LTDBROOKLYN CITY FOOTBALL CLUB — $15,000 · OtherBROOKLYN CITY FOOTB…JEWISH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherJEWISH FOUNDATION5150 — $5,150 · OtherChristian Herald Association Inc — $13,000 · OtherChristian Herald As…THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC — $6,000 · Other+14 more — $25,944 · Other+14 moreCOMMON GOAL USA INC — $50,500 · Recreation & SportsCOMMON GOAL U…South Bronx United Inc — $27,773 · Recreation & SportsSouth Bronx U…UNITED SOCCER COACHES ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED SOCCER…ATHLETE ALLY INC — $7,150 · Recreation & SportsATHLETE ALLY …+2 more — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsMIRACLEFEET — $42,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthWORLD VISION INC — $33,620 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,000 · InternationalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC — $25,000 · Civil Rights
Education$375,250Human Services$135,500Other$152,594Recreation & Sports$104,423Health$47,500International$35,620Civil Rights$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST LUKE'S SCHOOL — $140,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $130,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $106,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GOAL USA INC — $50,500 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTeam Steady Buckets — $50,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMIRACLEFEET — $42,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $33,620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Bronx United Inc — $27,773 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON MARKET SCHOOL INC — $18,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SOCCER COACHES ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc — $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATHLETE ALLY INC — $7,150 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNew York University — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEast End Food Institute — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATOOT INC — $4,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFOOTBALL FOR THE WORLD FOUNDATION USA — $3,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $2,557 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BOGARDUS PLAZA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPOWERPLAY NYC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids Cancer Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundCharities Aid Foundat…Womens Sports Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Goldman Sachs Cha…American Express Foun…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…
Jewish Communal FundNY15.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Womens Sports Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · American Express Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization C&P Levinsohn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to C&P Levinsohn Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to C&P Levinsohn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines