Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles L and Joan M Hirsch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Civil Rights$88kHealth$62kInternational$52kFood & Nutrition$46kArts & Culture$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kReligion$35kCrime & Legal$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$985k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LONG ISLAND CARES$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
ACLU$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED$10,000
LGBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS$5,000
CAMBRIDGE ART ASSOC$5,000
ANTELOPE VALLEY BALLET$5,000
LEWA WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY$5,000
COLLEGE BOUND$5,000
HIAS$5,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$5,000
WAY OUT LGBT FDN$5,000
CONCORD CENTER FOR THE VISUAL ARTS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WAYOUT LGBTQ FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WAYOUT LGBTQ FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WAYOUT LGBTQ FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WAY OUT LGBT FDN: $5k → 10%WAY OUT LGBT FDN: $5k → 10%WAY OUT LGBT FDN: $5k → 10%LONG ISLAND CARES: $10k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $6k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$399k · 16 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$399k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+48%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    Long Island Cares Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +141%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +114%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $31k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON PFLAG
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
3
National Lesbian and Gay Law Association

Nlgbtq+ bar association's purpose is to promote justice in and through the legal profession for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community (referred to collectively as the community) and its allies, and to provide a means to…

—
4
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
5
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
6
Los Angeles County Bar Association (Lacba)

Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.

—
7
American Civil Liberties Union Inc

As noted in its articles of incorporation, the mission of the aclu is "to maintain and advance civil liberties, including, without limitation, the freedoms of association, press, religion and speech, and the rights to the franchise, to due…

—
8
National Lesbian and Gay Law Foundation

To promote activities that will enable lgbtq+ and allied attorneys to become more proficient in their profession; to provide education and networking opportunities through conferences and programs for lgbtq+ and ally legal professionals;…

Civil Rights
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Maine

Mission - the aclu of maine works to support bills that advance civil rights and civil liberties and oppose bills that would curtail them. we also provide voter education about how to vote and voting rights at the polls. we do not endorse…

—
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
11
A Wider Bridge

A Wider Bridge mobilizes the LGBTQ community to fight antisemitism and support Israel and its LGBTQ community.

Civil Rights
12
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College Bound Inc; the most unlike its peers is Antelope Valley Ballet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU: $46,000 · OtherACLUTEMPLE BETH EL: $35,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELEVERY TOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT F: $26,000 · OtherEVERY TOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $21,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODGLAD LEGAL ADVOCATES DEFENDERS: $21,000 · OtherGLAD LEGAL ADVOCATES DEFENDERSINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH COALIT: $11,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATN: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FED: $10,000 · OtherCOLLEGE BOUND INC: $10,000 · Other+5 more: $24,000 · Other+5 moreLong Island Cares Inc: $46,000 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares I…The wayOut LGBTQ Foundation aka wayOUT: $30,000 · Human ServicesThe wayOut LGBTQ Fo…HIAS INC: $41,000 · InternationalHIAS INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $31,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN …EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN…Cambridge Art Association: $25,000 · Arts & CultureANTELOPE VALLEY BALLET: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $20,000 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 · Health
Other$214,000Human Services$76,000International$51,000Crime & Legal$36,000Arts & Culture$35,000Animals$20,000Health$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $46,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe wayOut LGBTQ Foundation aka wayOUT: $30,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetCambridge Art Association: $25,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY BALLET: $10,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The wayOut LGBTQ Foundation aka wayOUT ↗
  • Who funds Cambridge Art Association ↗
  • Who funds Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY BALLET ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE BOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles L and Joan M Hirsch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles L and Joan M Hirsch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charles L and Joan M Hirsch Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Charles L and Joan M Hirsch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles L and Joan M Hirsch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph