Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles and Joanne McIlwaine Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$183kYouth Development$103kEnvironment$99kArts & Culture$96kCommunity Improvement$68kHuman Services$50kFood & Nutrition$48kPhilanthropy$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $130k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS SMORGASCHORUS$15,000
THE QUIVIRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$15,000
WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
WICHITA STATE FOUNDATION$10,000
EXPLORATION PLACE$10,000
THE WICHITA-SEDWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM$10,000
GREAT PLAINS NATURE CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND$7,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - KANSAS CHAPTER$6,000
KANSAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CHALLENGES$5,000
KANSAS COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PANDO INITIATIVE: $10k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $5k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $5k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$912k · 21 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$912k
$5k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +27%
  • QC
    QUIVIRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +104%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • WE
    WICHITA EAST HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIPS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indian Waters Council Boy Scouts of America Inc

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath law.

Youth Development
2
Girl Scouts of Texas Oklahoma Plains Inc

Building girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
3
Girl Scouts of the Missouri Heartland Inc

Girl scouts is the premier leadership development program for all girls ages 5 - 17. our mission is to build girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place. we champion girl ambition by helping girls…

Youth Development
4
Kansas Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc

Ensuring that all children and youth can reach their full potential for physical, mental, emotional, and social health, growing up safe, strong, and with confidence in the future.

Education
5
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

—
6
Junior League of Kansas City Missouri

The junior league of kansas city, missouri (jlkcmo) is a 501(c)(3) organziation of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
7
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
8
Boy Scouts of America Council 552 Pee Dee Area Council

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
9
Girl Scouts of Ne Kansas and Nw Missouri Inc

Our mission is to build girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
10
Boy Scouts of America Council No 604 Blue Mountain Council Inc

To promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of america, the…

—
11
Girl Scouts of Western Washington

Girl scouting builds girls* of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
12
Southern Sierra Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pando Initiative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kansas Society for Children With Challenges. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $86,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQUIVIRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $75,000 · OtherQUIVIRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INCTHE WICHITA-SEDWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $50,000 · OtherTHE WICHITA-SEDWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $48,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREAT PLAINS NATURE CENTER: $47,500 · OtherGREAT PLAINS NATURE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $47,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY - KANSAS CHAPTER: $44,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY - KANSAS CHAPTERWICHITA STATE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherWICHITA STATE FOUNDATIONB29 DOC RESTORATION AND MUSEUM: $40,000 · OtherB29 DOC RESTORATION AND MUSEUMHEAD TO TOE HYGIENE PANTRY: $33,000 · OtherHEAD TO TOE HYGIENE PANTRYKANSAS COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $32,500 · Other+4 moreRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC: $150,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE …KANSAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CHALLENGES: $32,500 · HealthKANSAS SOCIETY FOR CHI…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$592,000Health$182,500Human Services$70,000Community Improvement$40,000Youth Development$27,500Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC: $150,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetQUIVIRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $75,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetKANSAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CHALLENGES: $32,500 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds QUIVIRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CHALLENGES ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353RI17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Berry Foundation Inc · Wichita Foundation · Spirit Charity Classic Inc · Belin Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · Servant Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles and Joanne McIlwaine Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles and Joanne McIlwaine Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Charles and Joanne McIlwaine Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Charles and Joanne McIlwaine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles and Joanne McIlwaine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph