Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporated

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
103
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$14MEducation$6.3MScience & Tech$2.4MArts & Culture$1.4MPhilanthropy$881kSocial Science$357kYouth Development$235kRecreation & Sports$171kOther$0
02FY2024 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $125k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $773k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.0M
$10,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$279M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$2,000,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL (MGH)$1,000,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$750,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$354,406
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$353,500
AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION$283,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$262,998
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$235,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$219,270
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$186,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$180,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$150,700
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$150,000
USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S$150,000
CHICAGO COUNCIL ON SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE SANDWICH AT A TIME: $3k → 9%WYOMING FAMILIES FIRST: $2k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS: $10k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN: $2k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $240 → 17%The Reading Team Inc: $150k → 17%THE READING TEAM INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporated’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporatedlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 148 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

148 repeat relationships: 55 still active in FY2024, 93 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

148
200

Total granted

$18M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+26%

Still filing today

68%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $435k · revenue +95%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $336k · revenue +26%
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $332k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TH
    The Hastings Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $242k · revenue +37%
  • IK
    INCF Karolinska Institutet
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • AA
    American Association for the Advancement of Science
    one grant, 2021 · $159k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is The Neue Galerie New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

217 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 217 of the 404 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
214/217
Grantees still filing
172/217
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DANA ALLIANCE FOR BRAIN INITIATIVES INC: $3,729,796 · OtherDANA ALLIANCE FOR BRAIN INITIATIVES INCUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $2,151,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELESMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL (MGH): $1,000,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL (MGH)+107 more: $9,765,057 · Other+107 moreLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1,142,971 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF …President and Fellows of Harvard College: $518,060 · EducationPresident and Fellows…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $336,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $310,707 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVE…Baylor College of Medicine: $301,022 · EducationBaylor College of Med…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $241,190 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $174,004 · Education+25 more: $1,811,990 · Education+25 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $435,000 · HealthAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $283,250 · HealthUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $150,000 · HealthNewport Hospital Foundation: $135,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $120,000 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $95,000 · Health+10 more: $227,550 · HealthGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $95,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $65,000 · Arts & CultureSCIENCE LIVE PRODUCTIONS INC: $64,100 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $54,000 · Arts & CultureANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $48,500 · Arts & CultureThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $45,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more: $398,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $332,000 · Science & TechNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $165,000 · Science & TechChicago Council on Science & Technology: $150,000 · Science & Tech+1 more: $20,000 · Science & TechBROWN UNIVERSITY: $354,406 · Community ImprovementMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $130,100 · Community ImprovementPalm Beach Civic Association Inc: $34,000 · Community ImprovementNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCHADWICK FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyRUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JAMES C FERRER EDUCATIONAL FUNDINC (FORMERLY SHINNECOCK HILLS EDUCATIONAL ): $15,000 · PhilanthropyCHS NORTH AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $13,720 · Philanthropy
Other$16,646,353Education$4,835,944Health$1,445,800Arts & Culture$1,229,600Science & Tech$667,000Community Improvement$543,506Philanthropy$333,720

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDANA ALLIANCE FOR BRAIN INITIATIVES INC: $3,729,796 over 2y, 100% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1,142,971 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $518,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $435,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $354,406 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $336,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $332,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $310,707 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $301,022 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $283,250 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $266,667 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADING TEAM INC: $250,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetThe Hastings Center Inc: $242,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $241,190 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $174,004 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $165,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BRAIN BEE: $160,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $150,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetChicago Council on Science & Technology: $150,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $148,690 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $145,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNewport Hospital Foundation: $135,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $130,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST FRANCIS XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $125,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM INC: $110,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY: $105,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $100,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEUROMATCH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA: $80,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetST MICHAEL'S COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $75,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WINSOR SCHOOL: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $65,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSCIENCE LIVE PRODUCTIONS INC: $64,100 over 5y, 37% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DANA ALLIANCE FOR BRAIN INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hastings Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BRAIN BEE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY23× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Hamilton Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Select Equity Group Foundation · The Simons Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Pinkerton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Wetlands Institute: 2% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • ME2 Orchestra Inc: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Concord Antiquarian Society D/B/a Concord Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Wheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
  • American Repertory Theatre Co Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to The Charles a Dana Foundation Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 404 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles a Dana’s filings →

More from the funding graph