· Public charity
The Charity Bowl Football Game
Raise money to benefit children's charities in southeastern virginia.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $252,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $415,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $163,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Toby's Dream FND | $15,000 |
| Children's Health Inv Program (CHIP) | $15,000 |
| Special Olympics of Va Beach | $15,000 |
| Norfolk CASA | $10,000 |
| Center for Child & Family Services | $10,000 |
| Eliza Hope FND | $10,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Southeast VA | $10,000 |
| Forkids | $10,000 |
| Samaritan House | $10,000 |
| Foodbank of Southeastern VA Eastern Shore | $10,000 |
| Recovery For Kids | $10,000 |
| ROC Solid Foundation | $10,000 |
| An Achievable Dream | $10,000 |
| Edmarc | $10,000 |
| Children Assistive Tech SVCS (CATS) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $333k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters5× · 2017–2023 · $273k · revenue +106%
- BABoys and Girls Club of Southeast Virginia8× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +141%
- FOFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- CCCHESAPEAKE CARE RESOURCES INCone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +2%
- SAStop Abuse Incone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For children's sake is dedicated to promoting positive environments for children and families that develop trust, stability and independence.
To advance programs, practices, and policies that nurture children, empower families, and support communities.
The Children's Advocacy Centers of Virginia (CACVA) promotes and supports the development, growth and continuation of child advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams across the state in their service to child victims of abuse and…
Create a safe environment for children by preventing and responding to child abuse.
The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.
Our mission is to reduce the numbers of children in the foster care system through adoption outreach education recruitment and support. We seek to increase permanency opportunities for Virginias waiting children. Additionally we aim to…
Casa of central va, inc. recruits, trains and supports volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children involved in juvenile court proceedings in the 24th judicial district and educates the community about the needs of these children.
Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.
Make life better for children with cancer and their families in virginia
To provide shelter and to engage in dedicated efforts to eliminate domestic violence. the organization provides advocacy, support, and education to those who have been affected by domestic violence in the cities of chesapeake and…
The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mother Seton House Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Mcwaters Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Southeast Virginia ↗
- Who funds The Joy Fund Foundation ↗
- Who funds OLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds EDMARC INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA GENTLEMEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TOBY'S DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA BEACH COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds AIDNOW ↗
- Who funds AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC ↗
- Who funds Recovery for the City ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF FOSTER CARE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Samaritan House Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NORFOLK CASA INC ↗
- Who funds ABILITY CENTER OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MCWATERS FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds I NEED A LIGHTHOUSE ↗
- Who funds HAMPTON ROADS YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BACON STREET YOUTH AND FAMILY SVCS ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF TIDEWATER INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE CARE RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds Stop Abuse Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN OF TIDEWATER INC ↗
- Who funds JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hampton Roads Community Foundation · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · Sentara Health · The McWaters Family Foundation · Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation · The Southeast Virginia Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Beazley Foundation Incorporated · The Blocker Foundation · Townebank Foundation · Tidewater Children's Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Charity Bowl Football Game funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.