Skip to content
The Chapel Hill Residential Retirement Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Chapel Hill Residential Retirement Center Inc

Carol woods shall be a charitable, not-for-profit corporation meeting the needs of older adults for housing, health, well-being, and protection of financial security.

$908k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.0MEmployment$798kHealth$610kPublic Benefit$545kHousing & Shelter$436kFood & Nutrition$292kCommunity Improvement$25kPhilanthropy$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $845,775, the rows itemized in this filing. The $908,108 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $62,333 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $536k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$128M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA$175,000
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL$125,000
CHARLES HOUSE ASSOCIATION$75,600
PEE WEE HOMES$60,000
CHAPEL HILL CARRBORO MEALS ON WHEELS$50,000
UNC SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$50,000
MARIAN CHEEK JACKSON CENTER$40,000
HOPE RENOVATIONS$35,000
SOLTYS PLACE$31,175
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY$25,000
UCC LIVING CENTERS INC$25,000
LEADING AGE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION$25,000
INTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES$25,000
SNOW APPROACH FOUNDATION INC$20,000
CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $561k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EVERY AGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%LEADINGAGE NC: $38k → 8%LEADING AGE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%LEADING AGE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%LEADING AGE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%LEADING AGE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%LEADING AGE NC FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CHARLES HOUSE: $105k → 13%CHARLES HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $76k → 13%CHARLES HOUSE: $75k → 13%CHARLES HOUSE: $60k → 13%CHARLES HOUSE: $60k → 13%SOLTYS PLACE: $31k → 13%SENIOR CARE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $27k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 20 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$4.5M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+9%

Still filing today

70%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARLES HOUSE ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $376k · revenue +30%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $295k · revenue +145%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS ORANGE COUNTY NC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $242k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • RS
    Residential Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • US
    UNC SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2019 · $46k
  • EF
    EVERYAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nc Orange Senior Housing Corp

The organization provides elderly or disabled persons with housing facilities and services specially designed to meet their physical, social, and psychological needs, and to promote their health, security, happiness, and usefulness in…

Housing & Shelter
2
New Bern Older Adult Housing Incorporated

To provide affordable housing to senior citizens in new bern, north carolina.

Housing & Shelter
3
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
4
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
5
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
Presbyterian Homes of Charlotte Inc

Low-rent government assisted housing for the elderly.

—
9
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
10
Secu Family House At Unc Hospitals

Secu family house at unc hospitals provides an affordable, safe, nurturing home away from home for seriously ill patients, their family members, and caregivers from throughout north carolina and beyond.

Health
11
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
12
Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oe Enterprises Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Rescue Missions Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS: $1,425,000 · OtherORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONSTHE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $545,000 · OtherTHE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARYMEALS ON WHEELS ORANGE COUNTY NC: $242,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS ORANGE COUNTY NCCHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO SCHOOLS: $215,000 · OtherCHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO SCHOOLSA HELPING HAND: $115,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity Orange County NC Inc: $112,000 · Other+14 more: $392,700 · Other+14 moreCHARLES HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $375,600 · Human ServicesCHARLES HOUSE…LEADINGAGE NORTH CAROLINA: $102,500 · Human ServicesLEADINGAGE NO…SENIOR CARE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $58,175 · Human ServicesSENIOR CARE O…EVERYAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesLOCAL START DENTAL INC: $235,000 · HealthLOCAL STA…PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC: $65,000 · HealthPIEDMONT …SENIOR PHARMASSIST INC: $55,000 · HealthSENIOR PH…Residential Services Inc: $50,000 · HealthResidenti…UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $294,800 · EducationPEE WEE HOMES: $194,000 · Housing & ShelterUCC LIVING CENTERS INCORPORATED: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER: $155,000 · EmploymentSnow Approach Foundation Inc: $82,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,046,700Human Services$561,275Health$405,000Education$294,800Housing & Shelter$219,000Employment$155,000Community Improvement$82,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLES HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $375,600 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $294,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS ORANGE COUNTY NC: $242,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetLOCAL START DENTAL INC: $235,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetPEE WEE HOMES: $194,000 over 4y, 49% of budgetHOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER: $155,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetA HELPING HAND: $115,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Orange County NC Inc: $112,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLEADINGAGE NORTH CAROLINA: $102,500 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetSnow Approach Foundation Inc: $82,000 over 3y, 66% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF NURSING FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetINTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CARE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $58,175 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetSENIOR PHARMASSIST INC: $55,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetResidential Services Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOE ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED: $42,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUCC LIVING CENTERS INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGuiding Lights: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLES HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ORANGE COUNTY NC ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL START DENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PEE WEE HOMES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER ↗
  • Who funds A HELPING HAND ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Orange County NC Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEADINGAGE NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds Snow Approach Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF NURSING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CARE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR PHARMASSIST INC ↗
  • Who funds Residential Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds OE ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Marian Cheek Jackson Center ↗
  • Who funds EVERYAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCC LIVING CENTERS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Guiding Lights ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Strowd Roses IncUnited Way of the Gre…Bertsch Family Charit…Shared Visions Founda…Duke Energy FoundationYusko Family Foundati…ImpactassetsincRaymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC30.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Strowd Roses Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Bertsch Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Shared Visions Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Yusko Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chapel Hill Residential Retirement Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chapel Hill Residential Retirement Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chapel Hill Residential Retirement Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home