· Private foundation
The Chantal and Tommy Bagwell Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $277k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $752k
- $250k+5 grants · $8.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $3,711,000 |
| STAND TOGETHER TRUST | $3,000,000 |
| KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,333,333 |
| THE ROTARY FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA | $333,333 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA FOUNDATION | $232,500 |
| REACH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC | $209,284 |
| GEORGIA CENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY | $200,000 |
| NORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $60,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF FORSYTH COUNTY CHARITIES | $50,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER ATLANTA | $35,000 |
| ELACHEE NATURE SCIENCE CENTER | $35,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN | $30,000 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $25,000 |
| YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $541k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KSKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $7.6M · revenue +61%
- TSTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC3× · 2023–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +194%
- CHCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC3× · 2023–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +26%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2024 · $500k
- ASALBANY STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $280k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIAone grant, 2020 · $225k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary purpose of the association is to promote the educational programs of georgia tech through student body participation in "healthful exercises, recreations, athletic games and contests". the association "develops the young people…
The association shall empower alumni to forge enduring connections with their alma mater, each other, and the wider community. the association shall enrich the lives of alumni through a spectrum of valuable services, including dynamic…
Assist and further research at georgia southern university
To assist the georgia tech foundation in the acquisition of real estate or other projects for the support of the georgia tech institute of technology
The UGA Real Estate Foundation manages and improves various real estate assets for the benefit of the University of Georgia, governed by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. The UGA Real Estate Foundation may also…
To provide advice, guidance, and leadership to advance and promote athletics at georgia state university.
The georgia tech research corporation (gtrc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance, and economic development.
The georgia tech foundation real estate holding corporation was formed to hold title to real estate and similar property on behalf of the georgia tech foundation, inc., and for other purposes permitted under section 501(c)(2) of the…
The Georgia Southern University Foundation, Inc. was created to raise private funding to meet certain educational and institutional needs at Georgia Southern University not addressed by state allocations. The Foundation's primary mission…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…
The mission of the University System of Georgia Foundation, a cooperative organization of the Board of Regents, is to support and advance the work of the University System of Georgia consistent with the University System's Strategic Plan.
To engage in charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes and to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of georgia institute of technology (git) and to support its…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leitalift Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH GEORGIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REACH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATL COUNCIL 101 NORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Forsyth County Charities Inc ↗
- Who funds ELACHEE NATURE SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia Center for Opportunity Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LANIER TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE THORACIC SURGERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Champions Off the Field ↗
- Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Cherokee County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds NORTH FORSYTH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS OF FAITH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN DELEGATION OF SACRED MILITARY CONSTANTINIAN ORDER OF ST GEORGE ↗
- Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ALBANY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · North Georgia Community Foundation Inc · Athens Area Community Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Roy C Moore Foundation · Ralph & Mary Cleveland Foundation · James D and Diane S Magnus Foundation · Peach State Fcu Cares Foundation Inc · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · Verizon Foundation · Synchrony Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Chantal and Tommy Bagwell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.