Skip to content

· Public charity

The Chamber of the Chino Valley

Business membership promotion and economic development for businesses in the cities of chino and chino hills through various community events

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$18kYouth Development$16kPhilanthropy$13kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$7kReligion$7k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$623k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES$7,000
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER: $8k → 14%SALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
2
Christian Counseling Center San Jose

Counseling services, psychotherapy with children, adolescents and adults, marital counseling, parental counseling, group and family psychotherapy, psychological assessments, active training of staff and interns.

Health
3
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
4
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Tehachapi

To develop and administer programs designed to assist women and men in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, economical, social and spiritual difficulties associated with a crisis pregnancy.

Health
5
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
6
Eagle Rock Boys Home

Residential care for children

Housing & Shelter
7
California Womens Recovery Inc

Provide lodging, meals & safe haven for women

Health
8
Christian Residential Opportunities & Social Services Inc

Group Homes

—
9
Central California Family Crisis Center

The Organization provides shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for victims of domestic violence, housing crisis, and/or poverty.

Human Services
10
Family Promise of Santa Clarita Valley

With assistance of volunteers from the community and faith groups, the organization works to assist homeless children and their families to achieve sustainable independence, while offering hope, compassion, and preserving individual…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Sparrows Nest Maternity Home

We are a Christ-centered residential care facility for pregnant women in crisis. We offer a safe home that provides shelter, food, prenatal/postpartum care, spiritual, mental, financial, rides to medical appointments, educational and…

Human Services
12
Chico Rescue Mission

to provide recovery services to addicts

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is A Women's Pregnancy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys Republic: $8,000 · Human ServicesBoys RepublicA Women's Pregnancy Center: $8,000 · Human ServicesA Women's Pregnancy CenterSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INCCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $7,500 · OtherCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSECHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $7,000 · OtherCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWS…SLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropySLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUND…Rancho Del Chino Rotary Foundation: $3,000 · PhilanthropyRancho Del Chino Rota…OLIVE CREST: $10,000 · HealthOLIVE CRESTRELEASED TIME CHRISTIAN EDUCATION FOR CHINO VALLEY: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentRELEASED TIM…
Human Services$23,000Other$14,500Philanthropy$13,000Health$10,000Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Republic: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Women's Pregnancy Center: $8,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRELEASED TIME CHRISTIAN EDUCATION FOR CHINO VALLEY: $7,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $7,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chamber of the Chino Valley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chamber of the Chino Valley. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Chamber of the Chino Valley?

    Find your warmest path to The Chamber of the Chino Valley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chamber of the Chino Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph