Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Chamber of the Chino Valley

Business membership promotion and economic development for businesses in the cities of chino and chino hills through various community events

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$18kYouth Development$16kPhilanthropy$13kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$7kReligion$7k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$623k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$7,000
SALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER: $8k → 14%SALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
2
Christian Counseling Center San Jose

Counseling services, psychotherapy with children, adolescents and adults, marital counseling, parental counseling, group and family psychotherapy, psychological assessments, active training of staff and interns.

Health
3
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

4
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Tehachapi

To develop and administer programs designed to assist women and men in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, economical, social and spiritual difficulties associated with a crisis pregnancy.

Health
5
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
6
Eagle Rock Boys Home

Residential care for children

Housing & Shelter
7
California Womens Recovery Inc

Provide lodging, meals & safe haven for women

Health
8
Christian Residential Opportunities & Social Services Inc

Group Homes

9
Central California Family Crisis Center

The Organization provides shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for victims of domestic violence, housing crisis, and/or poverty.

Human Services
10
Family Promise of Santa Clarita Valley

With assistance of volunteers from the community and faith groups, the organization works to assist homeless children and their families to achieve sustainable independence, while offering hope, compassion, and preserving individual…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Sparrows Nest Maternity Home

We are a Christ-centered residential care facility for pregnant women in crisis. We offer a safe home that provides shelter, food, prenatal/postpartum care, spiritual, mental, financial, rides to medical appointments, educational and…

Human Services
12
Chico Rescue Mission

to provide recovery services to addicts

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is A Women's Pregnancy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boys Republic — $8,000 · Human ServicesBoys RepublicA Women's Pregnancy Center — $8,000 · Human ServicesA Women's Pregnancy CenterSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INCCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $7,500 · OtherCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSECHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY — $7,000 · OtherCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWS…SLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropySLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUND…Rancho Del Chino Rotary Foundation — $3,000 · PhilanthropyRancho Del Chino Rota…OLIVE CREST — $10,000 · HealthOLIVE CRESTRELEASED TIME CHRISTIAN EDUCATION FOR CHINO VALLEY — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentRELEASED TIM…
Human Services$23,000Other$14,500Philanthropy$13,000Health$10,000Youth Development$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Republic — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Women's Pregnancy Center — $8,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRELEASED TIME CHRISTIAN EDUCATION FOR CHINO VALLEY — $7,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $7,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Chamber of the Chino Valley funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Chamber of the Chino Valley?

    Find your warmest path to The Chamber of the Chino Valley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph