Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$16k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Greater Muscatine, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $45k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’19
0
’20
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Philanthropy$250kArts & Culture$17kRecreation & Sports$17kEducation$2kEmployment$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Galesburg Community School District$16,000
The Orpheum Theater$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Discovery Depot$5,000
Discovery Depot$3,000
The Orpheum Theatre$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Knox College$1,000
Galesburg Firefighters Association$1,000
Western IL Works$1,000
Galesburg Area Chamber of Commerce$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Safe Harbor Family Crisis Center$1,000
Brimfield CUSD #309$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Safe Harbor Family Crisis Center: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $250,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINEGalesburg Community School District: $16,000 · OtherGalesburg Co…Individual grant recipient: $5,100 · OtherIndividual g…The Orpheum Theater: $5,000 · OtherThe Orpheum …Individual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+7 more: $6,200 · Other+7 moreGALESBURG MUSEUMS INC DBA DISCOVERY DEPOT: $8,000 · Arts & CultureORPHEUM THEATRE OF GALESBURG IL NFP INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureKNOX COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationSAFE HARBOR FAMILY CRISIS CENTER LTD: $1,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$250,000Other$33,800Arts & Culture$10,500Education$1,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $250,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGALESBURG MUSEUMS INC DBA DISCOVERY DEPOT: $8,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR FAMILY CRISIS CENTER LTD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE ↗
  • Who funds GALESBURG MUSEUMS INC DBA DISCOVERY DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM THEATRE OF GALESBURG IL NFP INC ↗
  • Who funds KNOX COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR FAMILY CRISIS CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds GALESBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Central Bancshares Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Central Bancshares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph