Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cathleen a Conroy Charitable Founda

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$30kReligion$15kInternational$15kEducation$3k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$170k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC$1,000
THE URSULINE SISTERS$1,000
BEATITUDE HOUSE$1,000
SAINT MARTIN DE PORRES HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
CATHOLIC PARISHES OF THE VALLEY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK$1,000
VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $1k → 9%URBAN CONCERN INC: $1k → 15%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $1k → 9%URBAN CONCERN INC: $800 → 15%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $1k → 9%URBAN CONCERN INC: $750 → 15%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $1k → 9%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $1k → 9%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $800 → 9%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $800 → 9%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $800 → 9%INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $800 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 11 repeat orgs$750 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$62k
$750

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BEATITUDE HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +34%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +201%
  • Back 2 Back Ministries Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • XH
    XENOS HUMANITARIAN AID AND DEVELOPMENT FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE URSULINE SISTERS: $9,100 · OtherTHE URSULINE SISTERSBEATITUDE HOUSE INC: $8,650 · OtherBEATITUDE HOUSE INCPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $8,250 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE INCSALVATION ARMY: $7,800 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCATHOLIC PARISHES OF THE VALLEY: $3,600 · OtherCATHOLIC PARISHES OF THE VALLEYVAIL VALLEY SALVATION ARMY: $2,750 · OtherVAIL VALLEY SALVATION ARMYVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $2,400 · OtherVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION+1 more: $750 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS NETWORK: $8,200 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL CHILD…URBAN CONCERN INC: $2,550 · Human ServicesURBAN CONCERN INCBack 2 Back Ministries Inc: $5,700 · ReligionBack 2 Bac…Saint Martin de Porres High School: $3,000 · Education
Other$43,300Human Services$10,750Religion$5,700Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEATITUDE HOUSE INC: $8,650 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $8,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS NETWORK: $8,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBack 2 Back Ministries Inc: $5,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Martin de Porres High School: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN CONCERN INC: $2,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Back 2 Back Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
  • Who funds URBAN CONCERN INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cathleen a Conroy Charitable Founda funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cathleen a Conroy Charitable Founda. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cathleen a Conroy Charitable Founda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph