· Private foundation
The Carole C Remick NE HS Journalism Collaberative Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| New England High School Journalism | $115,000 |
| Regis College | $40,000 |
| The Wily Network | $22,500 |
| 826 Boston | $12,500 |
| Boston Arts Academy Foundation | $10,850 |
| Connors Kindness Project | $10,000 |
| Boston Cares | $10,000 |
| WordPowered | $10,000 |
| Rawstars Inc | $10,000 |
| Partners for Youth w Disabilities | $10,000 |
| Brickyard Collaborative | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Naragansett Council | $2,000 |
| Making Music Matters | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
REGIS COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $779k · revenue +45%- TWTHE WILY NETWORK6× · 2020–2025 · $253k · revenue +42%
826 BOSTON INC6× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +293%
Funded once
- WIWriteBoston Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +165%
- JFJENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +45%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.
To provide low income, first generation students who attend selective colleges the skills and resources they need to succeed in college and graduate prepared for careers in competitive and high wage fields. To seek upward mobility for…
Arck envisions an education system that fosters creativity and encourages students to value their voices and innovate in service of a better world.
Digital Ready activates the creative potential of young adults, especially low-income residents, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in Boston's innovation economy.
Minds matter connects driven and determined students from low-income families with the people, preparation, and possibilities to succeed in college, create their future, and change the world.
Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dream Out Loud Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jens Friends Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REGIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE WILY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds 826 BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNOR'S KINDNESS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON CARES INC ↗
- Who funds RAWKSTARS INC ↗
- Who funds WriteBoston Inc ↗
- Who funds JENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRICKYARD COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM OUT LOUD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds PEABODY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Telling Room ↗
- Who funds MAKING MUSIC MATTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Carole C Remick NE HS Journalism Collaberative Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dream Out Loud Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Carole C Remick NE HS Journalism Collaberative Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Carole C Remick NE HS Journalism Collaberative Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.