Skip to content
The Carol Schwartz Greenwald Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Carol Schwartz Greenwald Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$620kReligion$203kPhilanthropy$21kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$13,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ONE ISRAEL FUND$30,700
CAMERA$18,590
CHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL COMMUNI$13,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,060
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER$255
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMERA: $19k → 16%RESCUERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $30k → 22%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM: $5k → 6%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $43k → 17%The Hebron Fund: $2k → 20%CHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL COMMUNI: $63k → 9%Hidden Light institute: $3k → 12%Keep Jerusalem: $1k → 12%Congregation B'nai Tzedek: $3k → 8%Coalition for Jewish Values: $2k → 11%CAMERA: $10k → 16%RESCUERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 22%ATERET COHANIM: $3k → 6%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $13k → 17%CHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL COMMUNI: $58k → 9%BNAI TZEDEK: $2k → 8%Coalition for Jewish Values: $2k → 11%CAMERA: $10k → 16%RESCUERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $6k → 22%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM: $2k → 6%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $10k → 17%CHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL COMMUNI: $51k → 9%BNAI TZEDEK: $2k → 8%COALITION FOR JEWISH VALUES: $2k → 11%CAMERA: $8k → 16%HATZALAH YEHUDA: $2k → 22%One Istrael Fund: $113k → 6%American Friends of Ateret Cohanim: $3k → 17%CHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL COMMUNI: $13k → 9%BNAI TZEDEK: $1k → 8%CAMERA: $8k → 16%THE ONE ISRAEL FUND: $97k → 6%Ateret Cohanim: $1k → 17%BNAI TZEDEK: $1k → 8%CAMERA: $5k → 16%THE ONE ISRAEL FUND: $68k → 6%THE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND: $12k → 17%Congregation B'nai Tzedek: $1k → 8%CAMERA: $5k → 16%THE ONE ISRAEL FUND: $51k → 6%Congregation B'nai Tzedek: $1k → 8%One Istrael Fund: $50k → 6%THE ONE ISRAEL FUND: $31k → 6%Rescuers without Borders: $11k → 6%THE BINYAMIN FUND INC: $10k → 6%Rescuers without Borders: $7k → 6%THE CENTRAL FUND: $5k → 6%THE CENTRAL FUND: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CO
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$832k · 13 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +143% since the first grant, against +114% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$832k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+143%
+114%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OI
    ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
    6× · 2020–2025 · $408k · revenue +228%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    3× · 2019–2021 · $66k · revenue +145%
  • CF
    COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TI
    THE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +199%
  • BF
    Binyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israelgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +890%
  • HL
    Hidden Light institute
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
5
Us Israel Education Fund Inc
—
6
Israel Charitable Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
8
American Israel Education Fund
International
9
University of Judaism Foundation
—
10
Asif Inc

ASIF helps its donees by providing information and performing due diligence on charitable organizations in Israel on the donees' behalf.

—
11
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
12
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Hebron Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $408,448 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FUND LTDCentral Fund of Israel: $66,020 · InternationalCentral Fund of IsraelCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $64,911 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC+4 more: $20,300 · InternationalCHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI COMMUNITIES: $185,150 · ReligionCHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI C…Hatzalah Yehuda and Shomron Inc: $50,500 · ReligionHatzalah Yehuda and Shomron In…Rescuers without Borders: $19,270 · OtherTHE CENTRAL FUND: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,020 · OtherCOALITION FOR JEWISH VALUES INC: $6,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI TZEDEK: $4,830 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherHidden Light institute: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,800 · Other+4 more: $1,965 · OtherTHE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND: $11,500 · PhilanthropyHEBRON FUND INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
International$559,679Religion$235,650Other$53,385Philanthropy$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $408,448 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI COMMUNITIES: $185,150 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $66,020 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $64,911 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHatzalah Yehuda and Shomron Inc: $50,500 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTHE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND: $11,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Hatzalah Yehuda and Shomron Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Binyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cherna Moskowitz Foun…Associated Jewish Cha…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Cherna Moskowitz FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cherna Moskowitz Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carol Schwartz Greenwald Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carol Schwartz Greenwald Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carol Schwartz Greenwald Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home