· Private foundation
The Careth Foundation Martin
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $4k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE REGRANT P | $25,000 |
| GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE | $25,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY | $25,000 |
| GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
| THOUSAND CURRENTS | $20,000 |
| WOMENS REGINAL NETWORK PAKISTAN | $15,000 |
| YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED | $15,000 |
| DAWN | $10,000 |
| WOMENS REGINAL NETWORK | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GIGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC7× · 2018–2024 · $235k · revenue +56%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY7× · 2018–2024 · $130k
- GGGRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE6× · 2018–2023 · $125k
Funded once
Alliance for Global Justice Corpone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +3%- NMNATIVE MOVEMENTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +70%
- DFDEMOCRACY FOR THE ARAB WORLD NOW INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Women in Migration Network (WIMN), an international non-governmental organization, identifies and promotes human rights-based and feminist global migration policies. We lift up and support the experiences, voices and agency of all women in…
Global Network Building for Gender Equality and Women's Rights Activists: Fostering exchange, collaboration, and mutual support for joint efforts in capacity building and technical assistance, while deepening the understanding of gender…
To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.
Together with partners around the world, GI-ESCR works to advance the realization of economic, social, and cultural rights (ESCR), tackling the endemic problems of poverty, social injustice, and inequality through a human rights approach.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
GPP works within and across social movement sectorsto foster greater alignment around shared goals and strategies for transformational change.Through a combination of strategic consulting and political education, our team helps groups make…
International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.
A legal organization working to advance the rights of women, girls, and gender diverse people. We work on issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, climate, and racial justice in East Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the…
/The Rules is a global network of activists, organizers, designers, coders, researchers, writers and others dedicated to changing the rules that create inequality, climate change, and poverty around the world.
To strengthen and build womens leadership as an essential component in solutions that address climate change mitigation and adaptation, climate justice, human rights and environmental degradation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Womens Regional Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
- Who funds US Human Rights Network ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds NATIVE MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FOR THE ARAB WORLD NOW INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Got Green ↗
- Who funds Womens Regional Network ↗
- Who funds Lavender Rights Project ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Careth Foundation Martin funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.