· Public charity
The Campbell Institute
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k7 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST HELENS SCHOOL DISTRICT | $75,000 |
| KAIROSPDX | $45,000 |
| BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE | $40,000 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER | $40,000 |
| LATINO NETWORK | $40,000 |
| IRCO | $40,000 |
| BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT | $20,000 |
| FOREST GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION5× · 2018–2025 · $248k · revenue +139%
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER2× · 2024–2025 · $94k · revenue +45%
Latino Network2× · 2024–2025 · $94k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- SSSCAPPOOSE SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2021 · $40k
- SFSEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTERone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -9%
- CLCAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTEone grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To foster bridges of care, uniting and empowering Black, Indigenous, and Pacific Islander communities in the West Portland Metro Area through education, mentorship, and cultural advocacy.
To inspire confidence, commitment, and vitality amoung children, families, and communities; and to broaden awareness of african and african american cultural traditions throughout oregon.
The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…
The mission of educate ya is to facilitate multi-cultural exchange and address the integration challenges faced by latinos in oregon through bilingual health, leadership and education programs.
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Cairo advocates for and acts to increase equity and social justice through programs, services, and community organizing for immigrant children, youth and families to thrive.
In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…
Centro cultural promotes education and economic development, increases cultural consciousness, responds to community needs and celebrates understanding among the diverse groups in our community.
MARI acts as a resource organization emphasizing the importance of our collective history through community education, and ultimately help eliminate racism and injustice.
To support the lives of latinx and immigrant community members by creating a safe space that fosters leadership, education, wellness, and connection.
Causa works to improve the lives of latino immigrants and their families through advocacy, leadership development, civic engagement and coalition building. latino immirgants and their families are the heart of causa and inspire, implement…
Create opportunities and programs that promote health equity education and quality of life for the latino community in boulder county in colorado.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Network and the most unlike its peers is Mano a Mano. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds Black Parent Initiative ↗
- Who funds SEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Mano A Mano ↗
- Who funds Better Together Central Oregon ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Oea Choice Trust · Gray Family Foundation · Seeding Justice · Trail Blazers Foundation · Schoolhouse Supplies Inc · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Campbell Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Black Parent Initiative — 60% of income from government
- Capaces Leadership Institute — 53% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 29% of income from government
- Latino Network — 26% of income from government
- Better Together Central Oregon — 13% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Kairospdx — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.