Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cady Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$400
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$400
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$198kHealth$109kYouth Development$30kInternational$10kReligion$9kHousing & Shelter$8kHuman Services$6kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GATEWAY CHILDREN'S CHARITY$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JOSEPH'S INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $2k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $1k → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $750 → 11%BIRTHRIGHT: $250 → 11%MAREN FUND: $250 → 11%THE MAREN FUND: $100 → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $1k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $1k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$372k · 50 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 49 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
25

Total granted

$372k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+32%

Still filing today

66%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CITY ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $48k · revenue +97%
  • WS
    WHITFIELD SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $46k · revenue +62%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • Best Buddies International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +81%
  • SF
    SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
38/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKES HOSPITAL: $46,750 · OtherST LUKES HOSPITALWHITFIELD SCHOOL INC: $46,350 · OtherWHITFIELD SCHOOL INCEASTER SEALS MIDWEST: $24,753 · OtherEASTER SEALS MIDWESTBEST BUDDIES: $20,386 · OtherBEST BUDDIESUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY: $20,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSYTHE GATHERING: $8,500 · Other+42 more: $58,665 · Other+42 moreCITY ACADEMY INC: $47,500 · EducationCITY ACADEMY INCCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYGATEWAY CHILDRENS CHARITY: $11,900 · EducationGATEWAY CHILDRENS CHARITYJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $8,000 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL+7 more: $11,750 · Education+7 moreWINGS OF HOPE: $7,300 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $3,000 · InternationalST JOSEPH INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $2,500 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $1,750 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMAREN FUND INC: $350 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $3,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $1,700 · EnvironmentGREAT RIVERS HABITAT ALLIANCE: $500 · Environment+1 more: $155 · EnvironmentNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $3,000 · AnimalsSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTOWN WORKING THEATER INC: $450 · Arts & Culture
Other$225,404Education$139,150International$10,300Human Services$9,850Environment$5,355Animals$3,000Arts & Culture$2,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $47,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWHITFIELD SCHOOL INC: $46,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST: $24,753 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY CHILDRENS CHARITY: $11,900 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $7,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANA HALL SCHOOL: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADVENT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $1,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIOME SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILSON SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSSMAN SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeStart Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVERS HABITAT ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT CU INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTOWN WORKING THEATER INC: $450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELAND CENTER: $355 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAREN FUND INC: $350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLubin - Green Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITFIELD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS MIDWEST ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY CHILDRENS CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds DANA HALL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE ADVENT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BIOME SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds INFRA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO34.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · The William R Orthwein Jr and Laura Rand Orthwein Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Sidener Foundation · Sander Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resources · Stanley & Lucy Lopata Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cady Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cady Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • HomeStart Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cady Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph