Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bybee Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$91kArts & Culture$76kEnvironment$40kPhilanthropy$20kReligion$15kHuman Services$15kScience & Tech$12kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$489k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCOTT AND KIM VERPLANK FOUNDATION$8,000
MANZANO MOUNTAIN ART COUNCIL$4,500
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$4,000
DALLAS MUSEUM OF ART$3,000
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL$3,000
QUIVIRA COALITION$3,000
LEGACY OUTFITTERS$2,750
CHIHUAHUAN DESERT RESEARCH INST$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
OPERATION KINDNESS$1,750
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$1,750
WARRIOR BENEFIT$1,250
BILL WOMACK MEMORIAL CANCER CARE FDN$1,000
MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BILL WOMACK MEMORIAL CANCER CARE FDN: $1k → 16%BILL WOMACK MEMORIAL CANCER CARE FDN: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
WY
NJ
CA
KY
NM
TN
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$292k · 28 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
13

Total granted

$292k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+242%

Still filing today

57%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    Dallas Museum of Art
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +338%
  • QC
    QUIVIRA COALITION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +184%
  • LO
    LEGACY OUTFITTERS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • JS
    JACKSON SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCES
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • SG
    SOUTHWEST GRASSFED LIVESTOCK ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • AL
    ANN LACY SCHOOL OF AMERICAN DANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Texas Marines Medal of Honor Fund

The texas marines medal of honor fund is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization focused on the remembrance of the sixteen texas marines and one navy corpsman who received the medal of honor; the maintenance of the texas marine medal of honor…

Arts & Culture
3
Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation

To provide financial support and programs for fallen officer families. To raise awareness and advocate for national issues impacting officers.

—
4
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
5
Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation

We come here to remember those who were killed, those who survived and those changed forever. may all who leave here know the impact of violence. may this memorial offer comfort, strength, peace, hope and serenity.

Arts & Culture
6
Texas Wounded Warriors

The mission of the texas wounded warrior foundation is to raise awareness, to honor, and to empower our wounded united state military warriors, enabling them to assimilate back to daily life upon their return from combat. we seek to…

Public Benefit
7
Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement
8
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
9
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
10
Dcms Foundation

The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.

Health
11
Dallas Blue Foundation

Support the dallas police department, officers and families of officers killed or wounded in the line of duty, and to provide college scholarships for children of such officers.

—
12
Dallas Mavericks Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute: $14,500 · OtherChihuahuan Desert Research InstituteJACKSON SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCES: $12,000 · OtherJACKSON SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCESMANZANO MTN ARTS COUNCIL: $11,000 · OtherMANZANO MTN ARTS COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANN LACY SCHOOL OF AMERICAN: $7,000 · OtherANN LACY SCHOOL OF AMERICANSW GRASSFED LIVESTOCK ALLIANCE: $6,000 · OtherTHE SARATOGA MUSEUM: $5,750 · OtherALBUQUERQUE PRESCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans: $4,500 · OtherNORTHWOOD WOMANS CLUB: $4,000 · Other+16 more: $30,250 · Other+16 moreScott & Kim Verplank Foundation: $52,250 · EducationScott & Kim Verplank Fou…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA F…OCS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationOCS FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $1,750 · EducationDallas Museum of Art: $43,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of A…MANZANO MOUNTAIN ART COUNCIL: $10,500 · Arts & CultureMANZANO MOUNTAIN A…HOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $17,000 · PhilanthropyHOLISTIC MAN…GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $9,500 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE …Warrior Benefit: $6,250 · PhilanthropyWarrior Bene…THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MCDAVID …+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyQUIVIRA COALITION INC: $23,500 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentLEGACY OUTFITTERS: $15,250 · ReligionOPERATION KINDNESS: $9,500 · AnimalsDALLAS STREET DOG ADVOCATES: $1,000 · Animals
Other$115,500Education$69,500Arts & Culture$53,500Philanthropy$35,250Environment$25,000Religion$15,250Animals$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScott & Kim Verplank Foundation: $52,250 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetQUIVIRA COALITION INC: $23,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $17,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLEGACY OUTFITTERS: $15,250 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetChihuahuan Desert Research Institute: $14,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMANZANO MOUNTAIN ART COUNCIL: $10,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWarrior Benefit: $6,250 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetOCS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOOD WOMANS CLUB: $4,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENERATION INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS STREET DOG ADVOCATES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Scott & Kim Verplank Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds QUIVIRA COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY OUTFITTERS ↗
  • Who funds Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds MANZANO MOUNTAIN ART COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds Warrior Benefit ↗
  • Who funds OCS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOOD WOMANS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BILL WOMACK MEMORIAL CANCER CARE FOUNDAT ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds REGENERATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS STREET DOG ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds COTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bybee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bybee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bybee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph