Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bunny Williams Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2020
3
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$61kHuman Services$16kEducation$5kHousing & Shelter$5kPhilanthropy$5kEnvironment$5kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE$15,000
WOMENS SUPPORT SERVICES$5,000
SALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMENS SUPPORT SERVICES: $5k → 9%WOMENS SUPPORT SERVICES: $5k → 9%WOMENS SUPPORT SERVICES: $5k → 9%SALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 3 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +163% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$77k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+163%
+36%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $61k · revenue +57%
  • PS
    PROJECT SAGE INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +163%
  • TJ
    THE JANE LLOYD FUND
    3× · 2017–2019 · $650

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • DM
    DAVID M HUNT LIBRARY & SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Mattatuck Historical Society

The mattatuck museum is a center of art and history, a gathering place that nurtures creativity and learning through transformative experiences to encourage a deeper understanding of ourselves and our heritage.

Arts & Culture
4
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
5
The Connecticut River Foundation At Steamboat Dock Inc

The connecticut river museum's mission is to deepen appreciation of the river's history and to inspire its stewardship by providing unique educational and recreational experiences to diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
6
Bruce Museum Inc

The bruce cultivates discovery and wonder, engaging a broad audience through the power of art & science.

Arts & Culture
7
Innisfree Foundation Inc
—
8
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
9
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
10
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
11
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Sage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $61,000 · EducationTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDAVID M HUNT LIBRARY & SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · OtherDAVID M HUNT LIBRARY & SCHOOL…HOLLISTER HOUSE: $5,000 · OtherHOLLISTER HOUSE+1 more: $650 · OtherPROJECT SAGE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT SAGE …+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · Environment
Education$61,000Other$33,150Human Services$15,500Philanthropy$6,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $61,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT SAGE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID M HUNT LIBRARY & SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bunny Williams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bunny Williams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bunny Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph