Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bunky Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$43kAnimals$34kInternational$18kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$10kCivil Rights$9kEmployment$7kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$333k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,200
THE TREE TRUST$2,000
AUDUBON ALASKA$2,000
COURAGE FOUNDATION$2,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA$2,000
THE RAPTOR CENTER$2,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$2,000
KIVA MICROFUNDS$2,000
SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$2,000
NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIROMENTAL CENTER$2,000
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $70k → 16%ROWE AUDUBON SANCTUARY: $2k → 13%MINESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM: $2k → 5%COURAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%THE RAPTOR CENTER: $2k → 14%SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $2k → 10%THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $5k → 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 22%AUDUBON ALASKA: $2k → 10%NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIROMENTAL CENTER: $2k → 21%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE: $2k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 7%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $32k → 16%MINESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM: $2k → 5%COURAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%THE RAPTOR CENTER: $2k → 14%SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $2k → 10%THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $4k → 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 22%AUDUBON ALASKA: $2k → 10%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE: $2k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 7%MINESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM: $2k → 5%COURAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%THE RAPTOR CENTER: $2k → 14%SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $2k → 10%THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 22%AUDUBON ALASKA: $2k → 10%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE: $2k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 7%MINESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM: $2k → 5%THE RAPTOR CENTER: $2k → 14%SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $2k → 10%THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 22%AUDUBON ALASKA: $2k → 10%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE: $2k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 7%THE TREE TRUST: $2k → 11%KIVA MICROFUNDS: $2k → 10%WAYZATA CUMMUNITY SAIL: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MA
CT
CA
NE
VA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$144k · 19 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$144k
$1k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EnvironmentAnimalsInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +21%
  • TW
    THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • KM
    KIVA MICROFUNDS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
3
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
4
Whatcom Land Trust

The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.

Environment
5
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
6
Trustees for Alaska

Founded in 1974, trustees for alaska serves the public interest by providing legal counsel to protect and defend alaska's lands, waters, wildlife, and people.

Environment
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
9
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
10
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
11
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
12
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wilderness Society; the most unlike its peers is West Sound Wildlife Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYTHE RAPTOR CENTER: $9,500 · OtherTHE RAPTOR CENTERNATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA: $9,500 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTAIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOURAGE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherCOURAGE FOUNDATIONAUDUBON ALASKA: $7,500 · OtherAUDUBON ALASKAIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTree Trust: $6,500 · OtherTree TrustIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · Other+2 more: $3,000 · OtherTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETYSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $9,500 · EnvironmentSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUENORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER: $6,500 · EnvironmentNORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONME…BAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST: $5,500 · EnvironmentBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TR…EARTHJUSTICE: $2,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICESave The Children Federation Inc: $12,600 · InternationalSave The Chil…KIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,500 · InternationalKIVA MICROFUN…JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $9,500 · AnimalsJANE GOODAL…West Sound Wildlife Shelter: $5,500 · AnimalsWest Sound …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,500 · Health
Other$74,500Environment$33,500International$18,100Animals$15,000Health$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $12,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER: $6,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTree Trust: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWest Sound Wildlife Shelter: $5,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Tree Trust ↗
  • Who funds West Sound Wildlife Shelter ↗
  • Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
  • Who funds BAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bunky Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bunky Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bunky Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Bunky Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $70k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bunky’s filings →

More from the funding graph