Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Buddy Bostick Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$494k
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$86k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.1MHealth$12kCrime & Legal$6kReligion$6kRecreation & Sports$4kEmployment$3k
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $247k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$4,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$86,000
WACO FAMILY MEDICINE$52,000
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$45,000
MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$27,822
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$27,550
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$24,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$21,250
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE$18,000
HAPPY HILL FARM$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$12,000
WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY$11,750
EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$11,500
ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY$10,500
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HAPPY HILL FARM: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
IN
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 161 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

161 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 128 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

161
95

Total granted

$1.9M
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

6%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $74k · revenue +11%
  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • THE TSTC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $9k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • TW
    TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
3
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
4
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
Mcmurry University

Shaped by christian principles, mcmurry university challenges students to examine our complex world from multiple perspectives in preparation for lives of leadership, service and professional success.

Education
10
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hardin-Simmons University; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 276 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $255,250 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $135,500 · OtherTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITYWACO FAMILY MEDICINE: $66,000 · Other+181 more: $1,443,348 · Other+181 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $74,050 · EducationEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · EducationEmory University: $10,000 · EducationTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $8,531 · EducationTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $6,500 · EducationSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC: $6,250 · EducationOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · Education+8 more: $31,000 · EducationHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$1,900,098Education$158,331Human Services$15,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $74,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEmory University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $8,531 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC: $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michael & Susan Dell FoundationTX26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Robert A Welch Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Leola W and Charles H Hugg Trust Xxxxx8007 · CJ Wrightsman Educational Fund Inc · Irene S Wischer Education Foundation #FA945 · The Callaway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Buddy Bostick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Buddy Bostick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Buddy Bostick Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Buddy Bostick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 276 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buddy Bostick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph