Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brett and Deborah Barker Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$490kFood & Nutrition$250kHuman Services$200kInternational$125kHealth$95kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEducation$25kCrime & Legal$15k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT - CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES DEPARTMENT$50,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN NEVADA$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TRUCKEE MEADOWS$40,000
CHILDREN'S CABINET$30,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
THE EDDY HOUSE$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
NORTHERN NEVADA HOPES$10,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO$5,000
NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
SAFE TALK FOR TEENS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFE TALK FOR TEENS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +28%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +84%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRUCKEE MEADOWS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $180k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • NN
    NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • ST
    SAFE TALK FOR TEENS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
3
Nevada Childhood Cancer Foundation

To provide social, emotional, educational, and psychological support and programs to families of all children diagnosed with life threatening or critical illnesses and provide healing arts and wellness programs to adults touched by cancer…

Health
4
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
5
Carson Valley Health Foundation

None

Health
6
Nevada Health Care Association

To provide leadership and support to members assisting them to advance both professional and community interests in long term care facilities.

—
7
Nevada Children's Foundation Inc

To support programs providing the highest quality service to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. these services include a residential program at eagle valley children's home and a respite program provided in the…

Human Services
8
For Kids Foundation

The purpose of this corporation is to serve needy children by obtaining funding for medical, dental, mental health, and other necessary services which are otherwise unavailable, without discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex,…

Health
9
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
10
Gallup Community Health

Gallup community health's mission is to provide excellent and accessible medical care to our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Westcare Nevada Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
12
Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing

The Organization provides a full range of high-quality healthcare to children and adolescents in Colorado regardless of insurance status or family's ability to pay. Our services are mainly for the under-served and at-risk youth, including…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Health Alliance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT - CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $250,000 · OtherWASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT …AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENOCASA FOUNDATION OF WASHOE COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET …EDDY HOUSE: $55,000 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSE+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $250,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Northern …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRUCKEE MEADOWS: $180,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS C…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services: $40,000 · HealthNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$340,000Human Services$260,000Food & Nutrition$250,000Youth Development$180,000International$125,000Health$90,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $200,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRUCKEE MEADOWS: $180,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $55,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE TALK FOR TEENS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRUCKEE MEADOWS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE TALK FOR TEENS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The E L Cord FoundationNV17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The E L Cord Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Renown Health · Robert R Banks Foundation Inc · Roxie and Azad Joseph Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Tahoe Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brett and Deborah Barker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brett and Deborah Barker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brett and Deborah Barker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph