Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Breman Foundation Inc

This organization is operated exclusively for charitable, educational, and/or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish federation of greater atlanta, inc., an irc 501(c)(3) organization

$436k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.7MArts & Culture$1.6MPhilanthropy$1.3MCivil Rights$391kReligion$297kHealth$139kScience & Tech$87kYouth Development$71kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $388,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $436,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$21,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
William Breman Jewish Heritage Museum$135,000
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta$102,000
William Breman Jewish Home$62,500
The Temple$25,000
Jewish Family & Career Services$21,500
Anti-Defamation League-SE Regional$14,000
American Jewish Committee$10,000
Wisdom Center for Autism$10,000
Israel ParaSport Center$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $13k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $8k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $8k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $42k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $34k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $30k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $30k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $29k → 14%Jewish Family & Career Services: $22k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $22k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CO
KY
NC
DC
HI
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 21 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
14

Total granted

$4.3M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+15%

Still filing today

86%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HERITAGE MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +38%
  • TW
    The William Breman Jewish Home Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +13%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $262k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • NV
    Nonprofit VOTE Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -17%
  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • ZP
    ZABAN PARADIES CENTER FOR HOMELESS COUPLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +128%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
6
The Jerusalem Connection
—
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
9
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
12
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moishe House and the most unlike its peers is Nonprofit Vote Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr18%28%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr13%53%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
16%
11,545/72,360

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
25/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HERITAGE MUSEUM INC — $1,381,750 · Arts & CultureTHE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HERIT…ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $180,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER I…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,259,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATE…THE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $62,500 · Philanthropy+5 more — $51,000 · PhilanthropyThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc — $1,093,000 · HealthThe William Breman Jew…+2 more — $30,000 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $187,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $150,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN JEWISH RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $53,500 · Civil Rights+1 more — $10,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $261,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC — $58,500 · Human ServicesCREATING CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC — $53,750 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEMPLE — $143,000 · OtherTHE TEMPLEHEBREW BENEVOLENT CONGREGATION THE TEMPLE — $60,000 · OtherHEBREW BENEV…Blue Dove Foundation Inc — $46,000 · OtherBlue Dove Fo…KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION INC — $87,250 · OtherKENNESAW STA…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED — $64,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRI…IN THE CITY CAMP INC — $71,000 · OtherIN THE CITY …MOISHE HOUSE — $53,500 · OtherMOISHE HOUSE+10 more — $120,000 · Other+10 moreJewish Home Life Communities Inc — $191,500 · Housing & ShelterZABAN PARADIES CENTER FOR HOMELESS COUPLES INC — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$1,561,750Philanthropy$1,372,500Health$1,123,000Civil Rights$401,000Human Services$383,750Other$644,750Housing & Shelter$201,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HERITAGE MUSEUM INC — $1,381,750 over 9y, 18% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,259,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc — $1,093,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $261,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Home Life Communities Inc — $191,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $187,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $180,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $150,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION INC — $87,250 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetIN THE CITY CAMP INC — $71,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED — $64,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $62,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC — $58,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCREATING CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC — $53,750 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTHERN JEWISH RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $53,500 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE — $53,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Dove Foundation Inc — $46,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetTHE WISDOM CENTER FOR AUTISM — $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetEmory University — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNonprofit VOTE Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHillels of Georgia Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of …The Community Foundat…The Zaban Foundation …The Frank Family Foun…Ron and Lisa Brill Ch…The Marcus Foundation…The Arthur M Blank Fa…Charles & Esther Lee …The Engel Foundation …Jewish Federation of …Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta IncGA32× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Zaban Foundation Inc · The Frank Family Foundation Inc · Ron and Lisa Brill Charitable Trust · The Marcus Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Charles & Esther Lee Kimerling Charitable Foundation · The Engel Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Breman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines