· Private foundation
The Braitmayer Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $232k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APPRENTICE LEARNING | $50,000 |
| GROW PORTLAND | $45,000 |
| SEATLE UNIVERSITY | $44,832 |
| SPEAK WITH PURPOSE | $37,316 |
| GNOME INC | $35,000 |
| PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY | $35,000 |
| 826 BOSTON | $35,000 |
| VASE | $3,000 |
| FOOD FOR ALL SERVICES | $2,000 |
| ISLANDWOOD | $2,000 |
| ANERA | $2,000 |
| MARY'S PLACE | $2,000 |
| ANERA | $1,000 |
| NICARAGUAN | $1,000 |
| ALMA DEL MAR FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $291k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PGPROFOUND GENTLEMEN INC2× · 2018–2020 · $37k · revenue +56%
- CRCURE RARE DISEASE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue ×78
- OSOUR SISTERS SCHOOL4× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- NSNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +114%
- AFADVOCATES FOR YOUTHone grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue -4%
- IIMMSCHOOLSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +349%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…
The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Sisters School and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds APPRENTICE LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds GROW PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SPEAK WITH PURPOSE ↗
- Who funds PROFOUND GENTLEMEN INC ↗
- Who funds NACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds IMMSCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗
- Who funds CSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE 1881 RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE ORCHARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EcoRise Youth Innovations ↗
- Who funds GARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY GUILDS INC ↗
- Who funds 826 BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTO NUEVA ESCUELA INC ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds Urban College Of Boston ↗
- Who funds CHANGE IS SIMPLE INC ↗
- Who funds DC LANGUAGE IMMERSION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CURE RARE DISEASE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BURLEIGH MANOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY AND ECO-RETREAT INC ↗
- Who funds OUR SISTERS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHCOAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PINE TREE SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Karina Foundation · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Ludes Family Foundation · First Citizens Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Association for the Relief of Aged Women of New Bedford · Southcoast Hospitals Group Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Braitmayer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Coastal Foodshed — 66% of income from government
- Grow Portland — 36% of income from government
- Friends of Jack Foundation Inc — 36% of income from government
- South Coast Lgbtq Network Inc — 29% of income from government
- Southcoast Hospitals Group Inc — 15% of income from government
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- Southcoast Community Foundation Inc — 10% of income from government
- Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc — 3% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Old Dartmouth Historical Society — 2% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
- The Fessenden School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Braitmayer Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Braitmayer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.