Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bowman Family Charitable Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$60kPhilanthropy$60kInternational$39kHuman Services$28kCommunity Improvement$25kYouth Development$15kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
URBAN LIFE MINISTRIES INCORPORATED$20,000
LA JOLLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$99k · 4 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$99k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+163%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PZ
    PROJECT ZAWADI INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $34k · revenue +105%
  • UL
    URBAN LIFE MINISTRIES INCORPORATED
    2× · 2021–2024 · $30k
  • PF
    PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • SM
    SIGNPOST MISSIONWORKS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
  • KF
    KITCHENS FOR GOODgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +163%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +364%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
2
Somali Family Service of San Diego

Somali Family Service, guided by its community champions, empowers immigrants, refugees and other underserved communities in San Diego through its programs that promote health, educational and economic success, and leadership development.

Human Services
3
Kidzcare Africa

Kidzcare Africa is a fundraising arm for Kidzcare Tanzania. The Mission is to endeavour to assist children in Tanzania, to enhance the lives of disadvantaged, orphaned, and vulnerable children through the following programs of a Children's…

International
4
Zawadi Fund International

Care and education of highly vulnerable children and youth in Kenya.

International
5
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
8
The Lobiko Initiative

The lobiko initiative's mission is to advance the holistic development of children to lead a purpose-driven life of wellbing, equip a generation of leaders that empower transofrmational change, and promote the necessary infrastractures for…

Religion
9
Womens Empowerment International

Womens Empowerment funds econcomic empowerment programs including small business loans, training, education, and other vital poverty alleviation strategies for women experiencing poverty. More on Schedule O.

International
10
Forward Edge International

Our vision is to see people around the world overcome spiritual and material poverty through jesus christ.

International
11
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
12
Building Schools in Africa
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PROMISES2KIDS Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ymca of San Diego County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $59,549 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDLA JOLLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Community ImprovementLA JOLLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSIGNPOST MISSIONWORKS — $10,000 · Community ImprovementSIGNPOST MISSIONWORKSALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCE — $5,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCEURBAN LIFE MINISTRIES INCORPORATED — $30,000 · OtherURBAN LIFE MINISTRIES INCORPORATEDLA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherLA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATIONKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $5,000 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODPROJECT ZAWADI INC — $34,000 · EducationPROJECT ZAWADI I…HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $7,500 · Human Services
Community Improvement$89,549Other$85,000Education$34,000Youth Development$15,000Human Services$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $59,549 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ZAWADI INC — $34,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA JOLLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSIGNPOST MISSIONWORKS — $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bowman Family Charitable Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph