Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bolick Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23M
Granted FY2025still arriving
266
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$6.7M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of The Bolick Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 82 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2025, the last year The Bolick Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 218 organizations, $23M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

84
’21
111
’22
171
’23
209
’24
218
’25
82
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$42MInternational$6.8MEducation$3.1MPhilanthropy$1.2MHuman Services$991kCivil Rights$932kRecreation & Sports$655kYouth Development$599kOther$0
02FY2025 · 266 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $180k
  • $10k–50k144 grants · $4.2M
  • $50k–250k90 grants · $9.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $8.9M
$39,787
Median grant
33
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD$6,674,089
LUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES$990,667
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$957,155
CONCORDIA SEMINARY ST LOUIS$293,240
EASTERN EUROPEAN MISSION$248,547
GATEWAY INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS$200,000
RADIUS INTERNATIONAL$198,231
OPERATION MOBILIZATION USA$195,592
MESA GLOBAL$176,121
LAUNCH GLOBAL$172,311
CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FT WAYNE$171,106
EVERY HOME FOR CHRIST$159,149
BIBLICAL EDUCATION BY EXTENSION INC$149,480
CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY FELLOWSHIP INT$149,480
BIG LIFE INTERNATIONAL$149,480
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $512k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OVERLAND MISSION: $35k → 10%SHEPHERD'S HEART MINISTRY: $10k → 16%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $10k → 18%EVERYAGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%AMERICAN HOME FURNISHINGS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%THE WYNEKEN PROJECT: $5k → 19%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $10k → 18%EVERYAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%AMERICAN HOME FURNISHINGS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%EVERYAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%AMERICAN HOME FURNISHINGS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%EVERYAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $5k → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $5k → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $5k → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $5k → 12%RISING HOPE FARMS: $1k → 12%RISING HOPE FARMS: $500 → 12%RISING HOPE FARMS: $500 → 12%RISING HOPE FARMS: $500 → 12%EASTERN CATAWBA COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $50k → 12%EASTERN CATAWBA COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $50k → 12%ASHURE MINISTRY: $50k → 12%EASTERN CATAWBA COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $50k → 12%ASHURE MINISTRY: $49k → 12%CAROLINA CARING INC: $10k → 12%CAROLINA CARING INC: $10k → 12%CAROLINA CARING INC: $10k → 12%CAROLINA CARING INC: $10k → 12%CAROLINA CARING INC: $10k → 12%UNITED CHURCH HOMES AND SERVICES FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $10k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $5k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $2k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66M · 288 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

288 repeat relationships: 220 still active in FY2025, 68 since wound down; 52 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call). Read against FY2025, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

288
31

Total granted

$66M
$453k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-10%

Still filing today

62%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $824k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
ReligionEducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LAUNCH GLOBAL
    4× · 2023–2026 · $608k · revenue +117%
  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    4× · 2023–2026 · $536k · revenue +12%
  • BI
    BIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $515k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • LW
    LCMS WORLD RELIEF AND HUMAN CARE
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • LM
    LCMS MISSION FIELD USA
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • OE
    OPEN EYES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
3
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
4
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
5
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
6
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
7
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
8
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
9
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
10
Teaching Truth International

Provide christian teaching for pastors, teachers and other church leaders in various parts of the world. the teaching includes the bible, theology, church history, apologetics and practical ministry and related fields.

Religion
11
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
12
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Iredell Statesville Bible Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

227 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 227 of the 375 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
219/227
Grantees still filing
128/227
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD: $20,607,888 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNODLUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES: $2,193,375 · Other+102 more: $22,040,612 · Other+102 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $13,439,221 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROP…The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $536,328 · Philanthropy+2 more: $338,782 · PhilanthropyGATEWAY INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC: $1,900,000 · ReligionGATEWAY INTERNATION…LAUNCH GLOBAL: $608,401 · ReligionElam Ministries: $500,223 · ReligionRBC MINISTRIES: $478,986 · ReligionE3 Partners Ministry: $463,491 · Religion+62 more: $9,791,191 · Religion+62 moreUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $414,474 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $377,471 · EducationFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $272,359 · EducationLENOIR-RHYNE UNIVERSITY: $224,523 · EducationDISCIPLE NATIONS ALLIANCE: $199,141 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $197,398 · EducationMONTREAT COLLEGE: $170,111 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $169,611 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $99,928 · EducationLUTHER CLASSICAL COLLEGE: $90,056 · EducationBETHANY LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $80,678 · Education+1 more: $65,077 · EducationRADIUS INTERNATIONAL: $474,452 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $399,123 · InternationalCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $203,628 · InternationalWITH OPEN EYES FOUNDATION INC: $148,871 · InternationalAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $124,740 · InternationalFavor International Inc: $99,593 · InternationalNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC: $74,789 · InternationalThe Bucket Ministry: $74,597 · International+1 more: $55,000 · InternationalBIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $514,851 · Recreation & SportsAshure Ministry Inc: $249,436 · Human ServicesHorizons International: $194,574 · Human ServicesLutheran Family Services in the Carolinas: $65,051 · Human Services
Other$44,841,875Philanthropy$14,314,331Religion$13,742,292Education$2,360,827International$1,654,793Recreation & Sports$514,851Human Services$509,061

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $13,439,221 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC: $1,900,000 over 6y, 66% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $536,328 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $514,851 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetElam Ministries: $500,223 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $478,986 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRADIUS INTERNATIONAL: $474,452 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry: $463,491 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHARVESTERS MINISTRIES: $429,704 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $414,474 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC: $409,704 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $399,123 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $377,471 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSERVANT PARTNERS INC: $374,250 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetNEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC: $359,315 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetVISION BEYOND BORDERS INC: $325,111 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetJAARS INC: $323,113 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $322,359 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $289,474 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES: $282,332 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $272,359 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $269,553 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGLOBAL DISCIPLES: $264,403 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $258,683 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDare 2 Share Ministries: $254,844 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetEmpower Ministries International: $250,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetAshure Ministry Inc: $249,436 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $239,914 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL: $239,766 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetASIAN PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $238,782 over 4y, 12% of budgetFriends of Agape: $229,474 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetREACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC: $225,347 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLENOIR-RHYNE UNIVERSITY: $224,523 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $224,493 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $222,981 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER EUROPE MISSION: $214,945 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNEW GENERATIONS: $213,871 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTurning Point for God: $204,788 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $204,662 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $203,628 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLC Ministries International: $200,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $199,650 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDISCIPLE NATIONS ALLIANCE: $199,141 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetWORLDLINK INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $198,395 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $197,398 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHorizons International: $194,574 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $194,325 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBE ONE TOGETHER INC: $191,497 over 5y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
  • Who funds BIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RADIUS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds E3 Partners Ministry ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE MAILBOX CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVANT PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds Biblical Education By Extension Inc ↗
  • Who funds VISION BEYOND BORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JAARS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tyndale House MinistriesIL66.5× affinity34 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tyndale House Ministries · Christian Community Foundation Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · George Foundation Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · G II Charities · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · From His Hand Foundation · Beaver Family Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Underdown Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bolick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bolick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Childrens Impact Network Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bolick Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Bolick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 375 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bolick’s filings →

More from the funding graph