Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Blessing Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$119kInternational$91kEnvironment$31kOther$113k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$661k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TRAPROCK CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE$8,400
BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE$8,000
CULTURAL CARAVAN$7,100
PERMATOURS$6,600
BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$6,000
COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS$5,000
SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC$3,900
WORLD SINGING DAY$3,000
CELLISTS FOR CHANGE$1,500
PROJECT STEP$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%THE TRAPROCK CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $8k → 14%PROJECT STEP: $4k → 16%CHILDRENS HEALTH ADVOCACY INTERNATIONAL INC: $8k → 9%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $5k → 12%MAHALO ART CENTER: $8k → 11%PERMATOURS: $7k → 5%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%THE TRAPROCK CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $8k → 14%PROJECT STEP: $4k → 16%CHILDRENS HEALTH ADVOCACY INTERNATIONAL INC: $7k → 9%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $5k → 12%MAHALO ART CENTER: $8k → 11%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%THE TRAPROCK CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $8k → 14%CHILDRENS HEALTH ADVOCACY INTERNATIONAL INC: $7k → 9%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $5k → 12%MAHALO ART CENTER: $8k → 11%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%CHILDRENS HEALTH ADVOCACY INTERNATIONAL INC: $6k → 9%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $4k → 12%MAHALO ART CENTER: $8k → 11%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $4k → 12%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL AND CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $4k → 12%SPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC: $4k → 8%CULTURAL CARAVAN: $7k → 12%CULTURAL CARAVAN: $5k → 12%AFRICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%AFRICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $11k → 12%AFRICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $10k → 12%AFRICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $5k → 12%AFRICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%AFRICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $7k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $7k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $7k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $6k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $6k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $5k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $8k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $6k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $6k → 12%BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$340k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$340k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Traprock Center for Peace & Justice Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +34% · 34% of their budget
  • BC
    BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +21%
  • TE
    THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $31k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • P
    Permatours
    one grant, 2025 · $7k
  • BP
    BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2025 · $6k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    CELLISTS FOR CHANGE
    one grant, 2025 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Jazz Ambassadors
Arts & Culture
2
Longmont Concert Band

The Longmont Concert Band is a nonprofit organization composed of volunteer musicians from the surrounding community. Our goals are to provide quality concert band music to the general public, to provide a fun and invigorating atmosphere…

Arts & Culture
3
Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra

Charitable organization presenting musical events and educational programs. In 2023-24, Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra presented two world premieres and featured numerous works by women composers and composers of color.

4
Boulder Ballet

Boulder ballet creates engaging dance performances and educational initiatives that enrich human connections through the transformative power of the arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Chamber Music Society of Boulder

Boulder Chamber Orchestra BCO is a non-profit organization committed to providing exceptional chamber music programming education and outreach as well as an outlet for talented local artists in the Boulder community.

Arts & Culture
6
Boulder Chorale

To enrich and inspire a broad community through music.

Arts & Culture
7
Colorado Conservatory for the Jazz Arts

Education in the Jazz Arts for musicians of all ages.

Philanthropy
8
Flatirons Community Orchestra

The organization 1 provides an opportunity for community members who have an interest in instrumental music to participate in an organization with others and 2 provides performances for public occasions such as benefits for charitable or…

Arts & Culture
9
Fort Collins Symphony Association

Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.

10
Open Studios Inc

Open Studios is an organization operating in Boulder County, Colorado that serves artists and the broader community by advancing the visual arts through education and events.

Arts & Culture
11
Colorado Jazz Inc

Our purpose is to establish an active community within the freedom and culture expressed in authentic and engaging jazz experiences. As a performing arts organization, our goal is to strengthen the community through jazz performances,…

Arts & Culture
12
Boulder Suzuki Strings

Provide top quality Suzuki Method string instruction to children of all ages, educate parents in their role as a music educator and parent, foster continuing education of faculty associated with Boulder Suzuki Strings, provide financial…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Music Festival & Center for Musical Arts and the most unlike its peers is African Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $57,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INCCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS — $29,500 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR M…Project STEP Inc — $14,400 · Arts & CultureProject STEP IncTHE CULTURAL CARAVAN — $12,200 · Arts & CultureTHE CULTURAL CARAVANBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA — $6,000 · Arts & CultureMAHALO ART CENTER — $31,900 · OtherMAHALO ART CENTERSPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INC — $31,400 · OtherSPECIAL NEEDS ART FUND INCCHILDRENS HEALTH ADVOCACY INTERNATIONAL — $27,200 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTH ADVOCACY INTERNATIO…WORLD SINGING DAY — $10,500 · OtherWORLD SINGING DAYPermatours — $6,600 · OtherPermatoursIndividual grant recipient — $4,200 · Other+1 more — $1,500 · OtherTraprock Center for Peace & Justice Inc — $67,600 · InternationalTraprock Center for Peace & J…African Health Foundation Inc — $23,100 · InternationalAfrican Health Foundation IncTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE — $31,000 · EnvironmentTHORNE EC…
Arts & Culture$119,100Other$113,300International$90,700Environment$31,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTraprock Center for Peace & Justice Inc — $67,600 over 9y, 34% of budgetBOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $57,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE — $31,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS — $29,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAfrican Health Foundation Inc — $23,100 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetProject STEP Inc — $14,400 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CULTURAL CARAVAN — $12,200 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Traprock Center for Peace & Justice Inc
  • Who funds BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
  • Who funds COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS
  • Who funds African Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Project STEP Inc
  • Who funds THE CULTURAL CARAVAN
  • Who funds BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Boulder CountyCO17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Emsa Fund Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Blessing Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Project Step Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Blessing Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Blessing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph