Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bitty Foundation Co Day Pitney LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$156kInternational$113kEducation$99kFood & Nutrition$93kArts & Culture$88kYouth Development$35kReligion$30kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND$27,600
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$19,510
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE RIVER CENTER$15,000
END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER$15,000
EDWIN & DOROTHY BAKER FOUNDATION$5,000
MONADNOCK AREA TRANSITIONAL SHELTER$5,000
NH PUBLIC RADIO INC$1,000
KJAZZ 881$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TOUCHSTONE FARM: $5k → 7%TOUCHSTONE FARM: $5k → 7%TOUCHSTONE FARM: $5k → 7%THE GRAPEVINE FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $13k → 7%THE GRAPEVINE FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $13k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $15k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $15k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $15k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $15k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $15k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $15k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $13k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $13k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$575k · 13 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against -49% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$575k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-49%

Still filing today

69%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +87%
  • E6
    END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +111%
  • II
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $73k · revenue +429%

Funded once

  • WC
    Whittier College
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -49%
  • DC
    DUBLIN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GA
    GLOBAL AUTISM PROJECT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Phoenix School Inc

The mission of the School is to develop global citizens who are compassionate, creative, and technologically proficient individuals in a dynamic and interconnected world.

2
The Vincent Smith School

The Vincent Smith School is a co-ed, independent, special education school for grades ones through twelve, serving Nassau, Suffolk, and New York City students. The School specializes in students with various learning issues.

Education
3
The Bridge School inc

The Bridge School is a state approved independent Elementary school located in Middlebury, VT. Small by design, Bridge School accepts up to 50 preK-6th grade students annually to ensure students build strong relationships with peers and…

Education
4
Maple Street Foundation Inc

Maple Street School is a joyful academic community that cultivates personal and social responsibility. We nurture intellectual and creative growth through an engaging curriculum. Our culture of respect inspires confident learners.

Education
5
The Bedford School Inc

The mission of The Bedford School is to maximize the potential in children with learning differences and develop foundations for success.

6
Vermont Day School Inc

A pre-k-8 independent school whose mission is to foster the skills, knowledge, personal attributes and work habits to enable children to thrive effectively, meaningfully, and joyfully in the world of today and tomorrow.

7
Maine Arts Academy

The Academy is dedicated to academic excellence, commitment to the performing arts, leadership, integrity, and a virtuous code of conduct, all of which prepare students to meet the demands of a contemporary world through thoughtful…

Education
8
The Pine School Inc

The Pine School's mission is to promote academic, artistic, and athletic excellence.

Education
9
The Anacapa School

Through academic and experiential learning, we encourage students to integrate critical thinking, creativity, integrity and compassion in order to develop the potential of each individual in our diverse community.

10
Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc

It is the purpose of the Center to deliver the highest quality childcare, youth and adult development services to lower income families and the growing immigrant population in Bridgehampton and surrounding communities through educational…

Human Services
11
Baker School Extended Day Program Inc

The Organizations mission to to provide after school care through programs for students in a setting where children of different ages, interests and abilities can grow and learn.

Human Services
12
Lawrence Extended Day Program Inc

Provide after school educational programs to students of the Lawrence School in Brookline MA

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Walden School and the most unlike its peers is Whittier College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $115,238 · Human ServicesTHE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & …THE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $25,500 · Human ServicesTHE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND C…TOUCHSTONE FARM INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesTOUCHSTONE FARM INCINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND — $40,100 · OtherINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF …Individual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $29,510 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHTHE WALDEN SCHOOL — $13,000 · OtherTHE WALDEN SCHOOLDUBLIN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherDUBLIN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLGLOBAL AUTISM PROJECT — $10,000 · OtherGLOBAL AUTISM PROJECTWESTPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherWESTPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY…+6 more — $14,850 · Other+6 moreEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $87,500 · Food & NutritionEND 68 HOURS OF…NoticeAbility Inc — $44,000 · EducationNoticeAbility…Whittier College — $24,500 · EducationWhittier Coll…VICTORY HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationVICTORY HIGH …THE WALDEN SCHOOL — $43,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WALDEN S…FITCHBURG ART MUSEUM — $30,000 · Arts & CultureFITCHBURG AR…INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $72,583 · Civil RightsINTERNATIONA…The Edwin & Dorothy Baker Foundation — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEMI YOUTH CENTER INC — $3,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$155,738Other$157,460Food & Nutrition$87,500Education$78,500Arts & Culture$73,000Civil Rights$72,583Youth Development$33,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $115,238 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $87,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $72,583 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNoticeAbility Inc — $44,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE WALDEN SCHOOL — $43,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetThe Edwin & Dorothy Baker Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetFITCHBURG ART MUSEUM — $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $25,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWhittier College — $24,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCHSTONE FARM INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL AUTISM PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVICTORY HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetMONADNOCK AREA TRANSITIONAL SHELTER — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH INCORPORATED — $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC
  • Who funds NoticeAbility Inc
  • Who funds THE WALDEN SCHOOL
  • Who funds The Edwin & Dorothy Baker Foundation
  • Who funds FITCHBURG ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds THE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds Whittier College
  • Who funds TOUCHSTONE FARM INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL AUTISM PROJECT
  • Who funds VICTORY HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds MONADNOCK AREA TRANSITIONAL SHELTER
  • Who funds PEMI YOUTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH INCORPORATED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bitty Foundation Co Day Pitney LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 24%
  • International Institute of New England Inc24% of income from government
  • Fitchburg Art Museum2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bitty Foundation Co Day Pitney LLP?

Find your warmest path to The Bitty Foundation Co Day Pitney LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph