Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Greater Manhattan Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $13k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
11
’18
0
’19
3
’20
7
’21
8
’22
8
’23
6
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$15kEducation$11kYouth Development$6kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$2kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$398
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Haskell University Foundation$2,500
Island Green Association$2,500
Manhattan Community Foundation$1,500
Gage County Historial Museum$1,000
American Indian College Fund$1,000
Southwest Reservation Aid Fund$1,000
USD 497 Schwegler Elementary$500
True Colors$500
Lawrence Schools Foundation$500
Kansas 4-H Foundation$500
Manhattan Community Foundation-YES$500
Ranchland Trust$100
Manhattan Library Foundation$100
KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc$100
KARL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EmberHope: $25 → 9%KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc: $1k → 10%EmberHope: $25 → 9%KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc: $100 → 10%EmberHope: $25 → 9%KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc: $100 → 10%EmberHope: $25 → 9%KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc: $100 → 10%EmberHope: $25 → 9%KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc: $50 → 10%The House Cafe: $50 → 20%The House Cafe: $25 → 20%Home Care & Hospice: $50 → 20%Big Lakes Development Center: $50 → 20%Home Care & Hospice: $25 → 20%Big Lakes Development Center: $25 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NJ
CO
NE
MO
KS
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 37 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
14

Total granted

$32k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+91%

Still filing today

35%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K4
    Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%
  • ML
    MANHATTAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $650 · revenue +108%
  • BA
    BE ABLE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $600 · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • GG
    Green Gables
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • MS
    ManhattanOgden School Fdtn
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
2
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
3
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
4
Kansas City Community Gardens Inc

Kansas city community gardens is dedicated to improving the quality of life of low-income households and other members of the community by helping them grow their own nutritious fruits and vegatables. the member gardners develop…

Environment
5
Kansas Children's Foundation

The kansas children's foundation is dedicated to providing resources including financial and emotional support to children and families across the state of kansas.

Health
6
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
7
Kansas Health Institute

Improve the health of all kansans through nonpartisan research, education and engagement that support effective policymaking.

Science & Tech
8
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
9
Disability Rights Center of Kansas Inc

Zealously advocating for the disability rights of kansans to protect their full participation as citizens.

Civil Rights
10
Kansas City Country Club

The kansas city country club is a traditional, private, family-oriented country club dedicated to providing outstanding year-round dining, social and athletic activities to its members and their guests through superior services, staff and…

—
11
Kansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc

To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises

Food & Nutrition
12
Kansas Association of Community Action Programs Inc

Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Manhattan Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Manhattan Community Foundation: $9,600 · OtherManhattan Community FoundationIsland Green Association: $2,500 · OtherIsland Green AssociationUSD 497 Schwegler Elementary: $2,500 · OtherUSD 497 Schwegler ElementaryHaskell University Foundation: $2,500 · OtherHaskell University FoundationJeffco Public Schools-Green Gables: $1,700 · OtherManhattan Community Foundation-YES: $1,500 · Other+37 more: $12,250 · Other+37 moreKansas 4-H Foundation Inc: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentKansas 4-H Fou…GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,050 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyLawrence Schools Foundation: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 · EducationMANHATTAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $650 · EducationKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesEMBERHOPE INC: $125 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC: $75 · Human ServicesBIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $75 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE CAFE INC: $75 · Human ServicesDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $500 · EnvironmentKANSAS LAND TRUST INC: $350 · EnvironmentBE ABLE INC: $600 · Religion
Other$32,550Youth Development$6,000Philanthropy$3,100Education$2,650Human Services$1,700Environment$850Religion$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKansas 4-H Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLawrence Schools Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBE ABLE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS LAND TRUST INC: $350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan Arts Center Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMBERHOPE INC: $125 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFLINT HILLS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOUSE CAFE INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BE ABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER URBAN GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds Manhattan Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMBERHOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Manhattan Community FoundationKS25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable · Memorial Hospital Association Inc · Konza United Way Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Daniel Keating Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bill & Erma Riley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph