Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Biedenharn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$364k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$611kHousing & Shelter$385kPhilanthropy$373kHealth$262kCommunity Improvement$255kReligion$180kEnvironment$139kHuman Services$138kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOLS$60,000
BULL BUTEAU FOUNDATION$40,020
DUCKS UNLIMITED$31,300
KELLY MCGIMSEY FOUNDATION$25,000
GINGERBREAD HOUSE$20,000
CHILENO BAY FOUNDATION$20,000
HOLY ANGELS$20,000
SHREVEPORT-BOSSIER RESCUE MISSION$20,000
COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL$20,000
PET SAVERS$15,000
FB CHURCH SCHOOL$13,500
CADA$10,000
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SOUTH HIGHLAND FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RENESTING PROJECT: $6k → 13%RENESTING PROJECT: $6k → 13%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
NY
IA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 45 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
38

Total granted

$3.0M
$249k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+62%

Still filing today

42%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +45%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +6%
  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWEL CHARITY
    one grant, 2019 · $28k
  • JC
    JEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • NL
    NORTHWEST LA COMMUNITY DEV CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +866%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
3
Luke's House- a Clinic for Healing and Hope

Luke's house provides medical and spiritual hope, health, and healing to greater new orleans residents, creates patient-centered experiences for students, and connects patients to long-term healthcare solutions.

Health
4
Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank

Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.

—
5
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
6
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
7
Rebuilding Together New Orleans

Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.

Philanthropy
8
Crossroads for Youth

We believe the children and their families in our care deserve the chance to heal by being valued in a safe environment by competent, caring professionals. camp oakland is a private, nonprofit treatment agency that serves at-risk children…

Recreation & Sports
9
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
10
Deep South Today

Deep south today is a nonprofit network of local newsrooms comprising mississippi today and verite news. with its regional scale and scope, deep south today is providing critical journalism in underserved areas and ensuring its long-term…

Arts & Culture
11
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
12
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest La Community Dev Corp; the most unlike its peers is Wtl Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOLS: $515,000 · OtherBOSSIER PARISH SCHOOLSHOLY ANGELS: $125,000 · OtherHOLY ANGELSCOUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISH & DRUG ABUSE: $85,980 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $71,170 · OtherCENTENARY COLLEGE: $60,000 · Other+62 more: $855,676 · Other+62 moreCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $246,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY RENE…PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $165,000 · Community ImprovementPROVIDENCE HOU…+1 more: $6,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BULL BUTEAU FOUNDATION: $320,020 · PhilanthropyTHE BULL BUT…CHILENO BAY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyCHILENO BAY …MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $145,000 · HealthKELLY MCGIMSEY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthJEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · Health+3 more: $8,160 · HealthShreveport Bossier Rescue Mission: $170,000 · Housing & ShelterEVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHWEST LA COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterDucks Unlimited Inc: $160,300 · EnvironmentSend56 Ministry Inc: $80,000 · Human ServicesRENESTING PROJECT INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesRIVERCROSS INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$1,712,826Community Improvement$417,500Philanthropy$375,020Health$258,160Housing & Shelter$257,500Environment$160,300Human Services$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BULL BUTEAU FOUNDATION: $320,020 over 9y, 100% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $246,500 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetShreveport Bossier Rescue Mission: $170,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE: $165,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $160,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $145,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetSend56 Ministry Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetKELLY MCGIMSEY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetEVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPET SAVERS: $55,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHILENO BAY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST LA COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetRED RIVER REVEL ARTS FESTIVAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRENESTING PROJECT INC: $12,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEAMED RICE INC FKA SCI-PORT LOUISIANA'S SCIENCE CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNINNA'S ROAD TO RESCUE: $7,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTARA SAWYER FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERCROSS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFoster the Mind: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $3,071 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWoodys Home for Veterans: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $2,160 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $1,596 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARE AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF DENVER: $410 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BULL BUTEAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds GINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Send56 Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds KELLY MCGIMSEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PET SAVERS ↗
  • Who funds CHILENO BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WTL Ministries ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST LA COMMUNITY DEV CORP ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER REVEL ARTS FESTIVAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA34.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Wheless Foundation · Grayson Foundation Inc · United Way of Northwest Louisiana · American Electric Power Foundation · Poindexter Foundation Inc · Anita Mary Tippings Steinau Foundat · The Crow Foundation · The Powers Foundation Inc · Attaway Foundation · J B Atkins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Biedenharn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Biedenharn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Biedenharn Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Biedenharn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Biedenharn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph