Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bff Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$3.3MPhilanthropy$3.0MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$453kInternational$200kEducation$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $360
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $391k
  • $250k+2 grants · $716k
$90,552
Median grant
3
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$425,000
PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND$290,740
OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES$150,000
YESHIVA BETH JOSEPH TZVI DUSHINSKY$100,000
PINNACLE RTC INC$90,552
CONGREGATION BOBOV 45$50,000
KHAL YEHUDA LEIB$40,000
YESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK$18,000
Individual grant recipient$12,129
YESHIVA MEOR HATORAH$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PINNACLE RTC: $91k → 20%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $300k → 11%PINNACLE RTC: $91k → 20%PINNACLE RTC: $91k → 20%BOBBIE'S PLACE: $1k → 14%PINNACLE RTC: $91k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $150k → 20%PINNACLE RTC INC: $91k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $200k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $170k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES: $150k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $100k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 13 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$6.0M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+28%

Still filing today

54%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $855k · revenue +22%
  • TP
    THE PINNACLE RTC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $453k · revenue +53%
  • OC
    Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc
    3× · 2020–2024 · $350k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • MY
    M Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $400k
  • TS
    THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +28%
  • MA
    MESIVTA ATERES YAAKOV OF GREATER LONG ISLAND
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
2
Yeshivat Aish Hatorah

The organization was established to broaden the knowledge of jewish individuals to their heritage. the organization provides seminars and courses in jewish history and the torah.

Education
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
5
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
6
American Friends of Yeshivath Kerem B'yavneh Inc

To provide grants to religious schools providing higher education

—
7
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
8
Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School Ltd (Formerly the Meorot Inst)

To train rabbis, educators, and leaders who embody this vision in their teaching of torah, their spiritual support of individuals, and their building of diverse and welcoming communities; to foster and strengthen a network of rabbis and…

Education
9
Yeshivat Ohel Torah

To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education

Religion
10
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
11
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
12
Bnos Bais Yaakov of Far Rockaway

To maintain a school for hebrew religious and secular education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paypal Charitable Giving Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA BETH JOSEPH TZVI DUSHINSKY: $450,000 · OtherYESHIVA BETH JOSEPH TZVI DUSHINSKYM Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM INC: $400,000 · OtherM Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM INCCONGREGATION BOBOV 45: $250,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BOBOV 45KHAL YEHUDA LEIB: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherMESIVTA ATERES YAAKOV OF GREATER LONG ISLAND: $200,000 · Other+16 more: $716,289 · Other+16 moreAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $470,000 · Human ServicesAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY …THE PINNACLE RTC: $452,760 · Human ServicesTHE PINNACLE RTCOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $350,000 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Fa…THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $300,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CEN…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $200,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD …+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $855,000 · ReligionGATEWAYS ORGANIZ…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $150,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS…OHR NAAVA: $147,276 · ReligionOHR NAAVA+1 more: $36,000 · ReligionPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $590,740 · PhilanthropyYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $45,000 · EducationTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,616,289Human Services$1,773,760Religion$1,188,276Philanthropy$590,740Education$45,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $855,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $590,740 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $470,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE PINNACLE RTC: $452,760 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $350,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $300,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $150,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $147,276 over 1y, 53% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $45,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $36,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PINNACLE RTC ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR NAAVA ↗
  • Who funds EAST MIDWOOD HEBREW DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK ↗
  • Who funds BOBBIES PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY32.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Moshe & Simi Mehlman Charitable Foundation Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Fjc · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Maalot · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bff Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bff Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bff Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Bff Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bff’s filings →

More from the funding graph