Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Beverly and Frank Arnstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$832kArts & Culture$570kHuman Services$110kPublic Benefit$25kEducation$15kAnimals$10kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$45,000
DANA POINT 5TH MARINE REGIMENT$25,000
THE HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$20,000
BRAILLE INSTITUTE$10,000
JOHN TRACY CLINIC$10,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$10,000
DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION$10,000
ASPCA$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA: $15k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $15k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $10k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $10k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $7k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+62%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    8× · 2018–2025 · $565k · revenue +34%
  • DE
    DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +48%
  • JT
    JOHN TRACY CLINIC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • C
    CLAREMATRIXgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +76%
  • UC
    UCLA CENTER FOR DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DISTROPHY
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • WF
    Wayfinder Family Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
2
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
3
Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children

Part i and part iii, line 1: anchor center for blind children is a nationally recognized leader in teaching children with vision, cortical visual, dual sensory (vision and hearing), and co-occurring disabilities during their most formative…

—
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc

To drive the research that will provide preventions, treatments and cures, for people affected by retinitis pigmentosa, macular degeneration, usher syndrome, and the spectrum of retinal degenerative diseases.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John Tracy Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Dana Point 5TH Marine Regiment Support Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRAILLE INSTITUTE: $280,000 · OtherBRAILLE INSTITUTEDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $170,000 · OtherDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATIONUCLA CENTER FOR DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $130,000 · OtherUCLA CENTER FOR DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHYHOUSE EAR INSTITUTE: $115,000 · OtherHOUSE EAR INSTITUTE+5 more: $75,000 · Other+5 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $565,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Mus…JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $67,000 · Human ServicesJOHN TRAC…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOG…Wayfinder Family Services: $15,000 · Human ServicesWayfinder…DANA POINT 5TH MARINE REGIMENT SUPPORT GROUP: $55,000 · Public BenefitCLAREMATRIX: $20,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · Animals
Other$770,000Arts & Culture$565,000Human Services$137,000Public Benefit$55,000Health$20,000Education$15,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $565,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $67,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDANA POINT 5TH MARINE REGIMENT SUPPORT GROUP: $55,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLAREMATRIX: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHN TRACY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds DANA POINT 5TH MARINE REGIMENT SUPPORT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
  • Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beverly and Frank Arnstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beverly and Frank Arnstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beverly and Frank Arnstein’s filings →

    More from the funding graph