Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of THE BETTYE & MURPHY GEORGE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k43 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BURKE CENTER$30,000
BROTHERS IN WHITE CHAPEL INC$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LUFKIN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
HAROLD'S HOUSE$5,000
STUBBLEFIELD LEARNING CENTER$5,000
VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL$5,000
BOOK BUDDIES OF EAST TEXAS$5,000
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL$5,000
ANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE$5,000
PINEY WOODS FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION$5,000
12TH MAN FOUNDATION$5,000
THE JOSEPH HOUSE$5,000
ANGELINA COUNTY SECOND HELPINGS INC$5,000
STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $30k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE BURKE CENTER: $5k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%TEXAS FOREST COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%TEXAS FOREST COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 16%TEXAS FOREST COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 16%TEXAS FOREST COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 16%TEXAS FOREST COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 63 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
11

Total granted

$1.0M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+42%

Still filing today

41%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BURKE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +10%
  • TJ
    THE JOSEPH HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +165%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • JC
    JDS CENTER OF HOPE Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • AA
    ANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
2
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
3
Hospice of East Texas

Hospice of east texas seeks to enhance the quality of life for individuals and families dealing with life-limiting illness and to assist bereaved family members by providing comprehensive, coordinated care and support.

4
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
5
Texas Legal Services Center Inc

Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…

Crime & Legal
6
Hospice of Texarkana

The hospice of texarkana operation provides care to the terminally ill and provides grief support to the community. hospice of texarkana also has an inpatient facility available for our patients to receive care.

Health
7
Texas Flying Legends Museum
8
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
9
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
10
Texas Inmate Families Association

Our mission is to break the cycle of crime by strengthening families through support, education, and advocacy.

11
The Economic Development Alliance for Brazoria County

To promote and diversify the economic base, attract high-wage jobs in target industries to Brazoria County and support and champion the interests of existing businesses.

12
Tyler Economic Development Council Inc

Support economic development of greater tyler area.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Texas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Piney Woods Fine Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%9%<5yr12%18%5–10yr17%9%10–20yr20%23%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr14%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr12%24%5–10yr17%6%10–20yr20%11%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr14%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
44/346

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $54,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTUBBLEFIELD LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 · OtherSTUBBLEFIELD LEARNING CENTERBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST TEXAS — $45,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST TEXASTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $38,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCHAROLD'S HOUSE — $35,000 · OtherBOOK BUDDIES OF EAST TEXAS INC — $34,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $33,000 · OtherANGELINA COLLEGE — $32,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $29,000 · OtherSTEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $23,500 · Other+45 more — $270,500 · Other+45 moreBURKE CENTER — $70,000 · Human ServicesBURKE CENTERVOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL — $40,000 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEER SERV…THE MOSAIC CENTER INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesTHE MOSAIC CEN…HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE IN THE…BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE JOSEPH HOUSE INC — $55,500 · HealthTHE JOSEPH H…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $45,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTI…East Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope — $11,000 · HealthEast Texas C…+1 more — $3,500 · HealthANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $26,500 · Arts & CulturePiney Woods Fine Arts Association — $17,000 · Arts & CultureThe History Center — $11,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of East Texas — $9,000 · Arts & CultureTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation — $39,000 · EducationTLL TEMPLE MEMORIAL LIBRARY & ARCHIVES — $9,000 · EducationANGELINA COUNTY SECOND HELPINGS INC — $22,000 · Food & NutritionBrothers in White Chapel Inc — $15,000 · Crime & LegalANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$670,000Human Services$141,000Health$115,000Arts & Culture$63,500Education$48,000Food & Nutrition$22,000Crime & Legal$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBURKE CENTER — $70,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSEPH HOUSE INC — $55,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL — $40,000 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation — $39,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $38,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $26,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetANGELINA COUNTY SECOND HELPINGS INC — $22,000 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetPiney Woods Fine Arts Association — $17,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBrothers in White Chapel Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEast Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope — $11,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetThe History Center — $11,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $10,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTLL TEMPLE MEMORIAL LIBRARY & ARCHIVES — $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUFKIN INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetDEEP EAST TEXAS CRIME STOPPERS INC — $9,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetMuseum of East Texas — $9,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE IN THE PINES INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COALITION INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJDS CENTER OF HOPE Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS FOREST COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANGELINA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BURKE CENTER
  • Who funds THE JOSEPH HOUSE INC
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL
  • Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds ANGELINA COUNTY SECOND HELPINGS INC
  • Who funds Piney Woods Fine Arts Association
  • Who funds Brothers in White Chapel Inc
  • Who funds East Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope
  • Who funds The History Center
  • Who funds ST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE MOSAIC CENTER INC
  • Who funds TLL TEMPLE MEMORIAL LIBRARY & ARCHIVES
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUFKIN INC
  • Who funds DEEP EAST TEXAS CRIME STOPPERS INC
  • Who funds Museum of East Texas

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Simon & Louise Henderson FoundationTX30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Simon & Louise Henderson Foundation · The Pineywoods Foundation · Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation · Tll Temple Foundation · Brookshire Brothers Charitable Foundation · Hunter Family Charitable Foundation · Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation · Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph