Skip to content
The Beachbody Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Beachbody Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$143
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$2.1MHealth$681kEducation$192kHousing & Shelter$139kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kHuman Services$65kRecreation & Sports$28kEnvironment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$143
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE THE MISSION$143
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $40k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $1.0M → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $300k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $200k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $80k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
WI
NY
IA
OH
CA
NC
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 5 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +126% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$2.4M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAVE A WARRIOR INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $551k · revenue +126%
  • HT
    HOPE THE MISSION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $139k · revenue ×11
  • LG
    LEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY FOUNDATION INC dba LEEZAS CARE CONNECTION
    3× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • PP
    POLARIS PROJECT
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue -24%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +46%
  • ME
    MACHETANZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
2
Preeclampsia Foundation Inc

Preeclampsia foundation: 2025 impact statement saving lives and improving outcomes for mothers and babies in 2025, the preeclampsia foundation continued its unwavering mission to reduce maternal and infant illness and death due to…

Health
3
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
4
United States Lifesaving Association

Drowning prevention via public education and promotion of lifesaving professionalism

Recreation & Sports
5
Eric Paredes Save a Life Foundation a California Public Benefit Corporation

We educate students, parents, educators, coaches, & others working with youth about sudden cardiac arrest. we advocate for cardiac prevention through risk assessments, free heart screenings, cpr/aed training, aed placement & cardiac…

Health
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Pta California Congress of Parents 2122 Pine Grove Elementary

Support elementary school education

—
8
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
Pratham Usa

PRATHAM USA'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVES ARE (i) raising funds to support learning, (ii) increasing awareness about the challenges facing students and equitable approaches to improving learning outcomes at scale, (CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)

Philanthropy
11
Pta California Congress of Parents Teachers & Students Inc

Support elementary school education

—
12
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Para Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is Tovashal Elementary School Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Go Campaign: $1,595,259 · Human ServicesGo CampaignHOPE THE MISSION: $139,022 · Human ServicesHOPE THE MISSIONAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Bra…+1 more: $40,000 · Human ServicesSAVE A WARRIOR INC: $551,000 · HealthSAVE A WARRIOR INCLEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY FOUNDATION INC dba LEEZAS CARE CONNECTION: $50,000 · HealthLEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY …American Heart Association Inc: $50,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Associ…POLARIS PROJECT: $500,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECTRaincatcher Inc: $25,000 · International+1 more: $15,075 · InternationalMACHETANZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherHUDSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherJEFFERY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $50,000 · OtherLEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherMARYSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS: $20,000 · OtherTovashal Elementary School PTA: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $27,500 · OtherWATTS LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationRS Events for Life Inc: $20,240 · PhilanthropyBIG ORANGE CYCLING: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$1,874,281Health$651,000International$540,075Other$257,500Education$25,000Philanthropy$20,240Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGo Campaign: $1,595,259 over 3y, 37% of budgetSAVE A WARRIOR INC: $551,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $500,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $139,022 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY FOUNDATION INC dba LEEZAS CARE CONNECTION: $50,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATTS LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRaincatcher Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetRS Events for Life Inc: $20,240 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetBIG ORANGE CYCLING: $20,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $15,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTovashal Elementary School PTA: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beachbody Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beachbody Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Beachbody Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Beachbody Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beachbody’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home