Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bbc Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$109kArts & Culture$97kHuman Services$70kHealth$50kEducation$42kRecreation & Sports$36kEnvironment$32kFood & Nutrition$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CADAS$25,000
ARTSBUILD$10,000
ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FDN$10,000
ELIZABETH COLLIER FARMER ATHLETIC AWARD (GPS)$8,000
CHATTANOOGA COMMUNITY KITCHEN$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ORANGE GROVE CENTER$5,000
NEPH CURE$5,000
WATERFRONT CAPITAL CAMPAIGN NAKANAWA$4,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$4,000
ROOM IN THE INN$4,000
ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN$3,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND CHATTANOOGA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $7k → 12%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $7k → 12%CHRIS 180: $1k → 14%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $5k → 12%CHRIS 180: $1k → 14%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $5k → 12%KATE'S CLUB: $1k → 14%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $5k → 12%KATE'S CLUB: $1k → 14%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $3k → 12%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $3k → 12%ORANGE GROVE CENTER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$693k · 28 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$693k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+50%

Still filing today

61%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ARTSBUILD
    8× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +217%
  • TO
    THE ORANGE GROVE CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +30%
  • CF
    CHATT FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • EM
    ELISABETH MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -36% · 51% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • GA
    GPS ANNUAL FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
2
United Way of Greater Chattanooga

Uniting people and resources in building a stronger, healthier community

Philanthropy
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc

The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.

Food & Nutrition
5
Appalachian Bible College Inc

Serving the chrisitan community in the strengthening of local churches, promoting responsible christian character and maturity through educational programs, and preparing graduates for vocational and volunteer church-related service.

—
6
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
7
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
8
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
9
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
10
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatt Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Elisabeth Mitchell Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CADAS: $112,000 · OtherCADASUNITED WAY OF CHATTANOOGA: $84,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CHATTANOOGACHATT FOUNDATION: $34,500 · OtherCHATT FOUNDATIONROOM IN THE INN INC: $26,500 · OtherROOM IN THE INN INCELIZABETH COLLIER FARMER ATHLETIC AWARD (GPS): $26,000 · OtherELIZABETH COLLIER FARMER ATHLETIC AWARD (GPS)ELISABETH MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUST: $25,000 · OtherELISABETH MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUSTMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherTRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND CHATTANOOGA: $15,000 · OtherPATH FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · Other+15 more: $65,500 · Other+15 moreARTSBUILD: $105,000 · Arts & CultureARTSBUILD+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationALBERTVILL…Emory University: $15,000 · EducationEmory Univ…BERRY COLLEGE INC: $12,500 · EducationBERRY COLL…Rhodes College: $8,000 · EducationRhodes Col…THE ORANGE GROVE CENTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesKATE'S CLUB INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHRIS 180 INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 · PhilanthropyNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $22,000 · EnvironmentCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$444,000Arts & Culture$107,000Education$65,500Human Services$39,000Philanthropy$39,000Environment$22,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARTSBUILD: $105,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetTHE ORANGE GROVE CENTER INC: $35,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHATT FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetELISABETH MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC: $20,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetPATH FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE SHELTER: $14,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTANOOGA BOYS CHOIR: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRIS 180 INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARTSBUILD ↗
  • Who funds THE ORANGE GROVE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELISABETH MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Rhodes College ↗
  • Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds KATE'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA BOYS CHOIR ↗
  • Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bbc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bbc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bbc Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bbc Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bbc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph