· Private foundation
The Batt Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA | $50,000 |
| GOOD DEED REVOLUTION | $40,000 |
| NERD HQ | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $20,000 |
| DAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $13,000 |
| BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| KINGS CROSS CHURCH | $6,000 |
| DAVIS RUNNING CLUB | $5,000 |
| MONTANA LICENSED CLINICAL PROFESSIO | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,882 |
| IDAHO COUNSELING ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,155 |
| PROCARES MEDICAL NON-PROFIT | $1,200 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS2× · 2023–2025 · $125k
- GDGOOD DEED REVOLUTION3× · 2023–2025 · $110k · revenue +41%
- DEDavis Education Foundation3× · 2023–2025 · $76k · revenue -15%
Funded once
- BYBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $32k
- USUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $30k
- KAKYLE AND ABBY CHARLESWORTHone grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
HOPE Mental Health Foundation seeks to remove barriers to therapy so individuals can progress emotionally and break cycles of destruction for themselves, their families and their communities. We connect donors with individuals that need…
Mental health awareness
Community Health outreach
To reach the underserved population who suffer from mental health disorders such as anxiety and treatment-resistant depression while also initiating healing for clients dealing with the effects of trauma.
Mental Health Awareness
Provide mental wellness resources and education to dental professionals
mental health policy and service development
Mental health counseling
We fund medical research looking at depression and suicide. We have put together a film to be used by physicians and clinical psychologists and counselors to better understand and prevent suicide. These are multi year projects.
Funding & educating on mental health research
Scatter Joy is a 501(c)(3) organization that works to make mental health care more accessible and affordable for all.
To raise money and award grants for depression and suicide research
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOOD DEED REVOLUTION ↗
- Who funds Davis Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds NERD HQ ↗
- Who funds BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds BIG STUFF HEALTH SHARE ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RACE CATS ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COUNSELING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Procares Medical Non-Profit ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Batt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Batt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Batt Family’s filings →