Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Batt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Education$188kHealth$175kReligion$131kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$16kMembership Benefit$7kYouth Development$5kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA$50,000
GOOD DEED REVOLUTION$40,000
NERD HQ$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
DAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$13,000
BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$10,000
KINGS CROSS CHURCH$6,000
DAVIS RUNNING CLUB$5,000
MONTANA LICENSED CLINICAL PROFESSIO$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,882
IDAHO COUNSELING ASSOCIATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,155
PROCARES MEDICAL NON-PROFIT$1,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NERD HQ: $30k → 14%KINGS CROSS CHURCH: $6k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $30k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $32k → 8%BIG STUFF HEALTH SHARE: $10k → 10%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $20k → 8%DAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA: $75k → 8%DAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA: $50k → 8%DAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%MTN OPS: $20k → 6%PROCARES MEDICAL NON-PROFIT: $1k → 8%MTN OPS: $10k → 6%GOOD DEED REVOLUTION: $40k → 8%DERAY HUGH: $7k → 6%GOOD DEED REVOLUTION: $40k → 8%RACE CATS: $5k → 6%GOOD DEED REVOLUTION: $30k → 8%DAVIS RUNNING CLUB: $5k → 6%SKYE SIDDOWAY: $3k → 6%SKYE SIDDOWAY: $3k → 6%ETHAN OTTESON: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$396k · 6 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$396k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA
    2× · 2023–2025 · $125k
  • GD
    GOOD DEED REVOLUTION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $110k · revenue +41%
  • DE
    Davis Education Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $76k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $32k
  • US
    UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • HM
    HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Mental Health Foundation

HOPE Mental Health Foundation seeks to remove barriers to therapy so individuals can progress emotionally and break cycles of destruction for themselves, their families and their communities. We connect donors with individuals that need…

Health
2
The Help Show

Mental health awareness

Human Services
3
Nia Hope Center

Community Health outreach

Health
4
Hope Reins Healing Inc

To reach the underserved population who suffer from mental health disorders such as anxiety and treatment-resistant depression while also initiating healing for clients dealing with the effects of trauma.

Health
5
Defeat Suicide Foundation

Mental Health Awareness

Health
6
Dental Mental Network

Provide mental wellness resources and education to dental professionals

7
Oregon Mental Health Consumers Association

mental health policy and service development

Health
8
Caring for You Counseling Inc

Mental health counseling

Health
9
Young Minds Foundation

We fund medical research looking at depression and suicide. We have put together a film to be used by physicians and clinical psychologists and counselors to better understand and prevent suicide. These are multi year projects.

Health
10
Institute for Mental Health Research

Funding & educating on mental health research

Health
11
Scatter Joy Inc

Scatter Joy is a 501(c)(3) organization that works to make mental health care more accessible and affordable for all.

Health
12
D3 Research Foundation Inc

To raise money and award grants for depression and suicide research

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Deed Revolution and the most unlike its peers is Big Stuff Health Share. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA — $125,000 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAGOOD DEED REVOLUTION — $110,000 · OtherGOOD DEED REVOLUTIONDavis Education Foundation — $75,500 · OtherDavis Education FoundationUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY — $32,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more — $56,306 · Other+10 moreNERD HQ — $30,000 · HealthBIG STUFF HEALTH SHARE — $10,000 · HealthBOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $10,000 · EducationRACE CATS — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsIDAHO COUNSELING ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · Human Services
Other$508,806Health$40,000Education$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOOD DEED REVOLUTION — $110,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetDavis Education Foundation — $75,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNERD HQ — $30,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG STUFF HEALTH SHARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRACE CATS — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetIDAHO COUNSELING ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD DEED REVOLUTION
  • Who funds Davis Education Foundation
  • Who funds NERD HQ
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds BIG STUFF HEALTH SHARE
  • Who funds RACE CATS
  • Who funds IDAHO COUNSELING ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Procares Medical Non-Profit

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Batt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph