Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bascom Little Fund Co Andrew L Fabens III

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$400kYouth Development$12kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$917k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDEA STREAM$15,600
CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD$15,100
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AKRON SYMPHONIC WINDS$5,000
LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY INC$5,000
THE MUSIC SETTLEMENT$4,300
CLEVELAND CHAMBER COLLECTIVE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLEVELAND CHAMBER CHOIR: $5k → 17%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY INC: $5k → 14%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $15k → 17%BALDWIN COLLEGE CONSERVATORY OF MUS: $4k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $15k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $20k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%IDEA STREAM: $16k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $8k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $6k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $6k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $4k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $3k → 17%PANORAMICOS: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND CONTEMPORARY YOUTH ORECHE: $7k → 17%PANORAMICOS: $6k → 17%BLUE STREAK ENSEMBLE: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND CONTEMPORARY YOUTH ORECHESTRA: $5k → 17%BLUE STREAK ENSEMBLE: $4k → 17%PANORAMICOS: $3k → 17%BLUE STREAK ENSEMBLE: $3k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $20k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $17k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $17k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA: $4k → 17%THE LOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND: $7k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $14k → 17%CLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA: $4k → 17%THE LOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND: $6k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $11k → 17%CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER COLLECTIVE: $8k → 17%ENCORE CHAMBER MUSIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND CHAMBER COLLECTIVE: $3k → 17%ENCORE CHAMBER MUSIC INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%AKRON SYMPHONIC WINDS: $5k → 17%NO EXIT NEW MUSIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 17%THE MUSIC SETTLEMENT: $4k → 17%THE MUSIC SETTLEMENT: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$417k · 11 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$417k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+41%

Still filing today

55%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • I
    IDEASTREAM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +14%
  • L4
    LOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +74%
  • CP
    CLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA
    3× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CONTEMPORARY YOUTH ORECHE
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • NE
    NO EXIT NEW MUSIC ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CONTEMPORARY YOUTH ORECHESTRA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Chamber Symphony Council Inc

Music Performance - Performing free concerts of new symphonic music

Arts & Culture
2
Columbus Cultural Youth Orchestra
Arts & Culture
3
Muse Cincinnati Womens Choir

MUSE is an inclusive and feminist choral community advocating for peace and social justice. We unite our voices to raise awareness and inspire change in ourselves, our audiences, and our world through partnerships that honor the humanity…

Arts & Culture
4
Vivo Music Festival

Vivo's mission is to build community through world-class chamber music performances. vivo's vision is to serve as a launch-pad for local artistic engagement by presenting innovative, community-oriented musical performances throughout…

Arts & Culture
5
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

—
6
San Jose Chamber Music Society

To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

—
7
The Musical Arts Association

The Cleveland Orchestra inspires and enriches lives by creating extraordinary musical experiences at the highest level of artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
8
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
9
Citymusic Cleveland Inc

Citymusic cleveland is a professional chamber orchestra, which performs free concerts throughout n.e. ohio, accompanied by art shows of local artists. our mission is to develop audiences & build communities through the arts by presenting…

Arts & Culture
10
Milwaukee Community Orchestra Inc

Orchestral program for communit

Arts & Culture
11
Queen City Chamber Opera Dba Queen City Opera

Classical music performances in Cincinnati.

Arts & Culture
12
Midsummer Mozart Festival

The only music festival in North America dedicated to Mozart, our mission embraces both performance of highest artistic excellence and cultivation of new potential audience, including young people to assure the future appreciation of great…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Encore Chamber Music Institute; the most unlike its peers is Lithuanian American Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILD: $134,100 · OtherCLEVELAND COMPOSERS GUILDIndividual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPANORAMICOS: $19,000 · OtherPANORAMICOSBLUE STREAK ENSEMBLE: $15,500 · OtherBLUE STREAK ENSEMBLELOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND INC: $15,000 · OtherLOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND INC+9 more: $30,060 · Other+9 moreIDEASTREAM: $144,800 · Youth DevelopmentIDEASTREAMCLEVELAND CHAMBER COLLECTIVE: $16,500 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND CH…CLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA: $10,500 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND PO…ENCORE CHAMBER MUSIC INSTITUTE: $8,000 · Arts & CultureENCORE CHAMB…THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT: $7,300 · Arts & CultureTHE CLEVELAN…AKRON SYMPHONIC WINDS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAKRON SYMPHO…CLEVELAND CHAMBER CHOIR: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND CH…LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$255,660Youth Development$144,800Arts & Culture$52,300Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDEASTREAM: $144,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND CHAMBER COLLECTIVE: $16,500 over 5y, 20% of budgetLOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA: $10,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetENCORE CHAMBER MUSIC INSTITUTE: $8,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT: $7,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAKRON SYMPHONIC WINDS: $5,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetCLEVELAND CHAMBER CHOIR: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDEASTREAM ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND CHAMBER COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL 4 MUSIC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds ENCORE CHAMBER MUSIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds AKRON SYMPHONIC WINDS ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND CHAMBER CHOIR ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OHIO YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph and Florence Mandel Family- Michele M and Lawrence R Beyer Family FundOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph and Florence Mandel Family- Michele M and Lawrence R Beyer Family Fund · The George Gund Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bascom Little Fund Co Andrew L Fabens III funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bascom Little Fund Co Andrew L Fabens III. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bascom Little Fund Co Andrew L Fabens III?

    Find your warmest path to The Bascom Little Fund Co Andrew L Fabens III through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bascom Little Fund Co Andrew L Fabens III’s filings →

    More from the funding graph