Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barnett Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$15kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$7kArts & Culture$7kEducation$1kHuman Services$650Environment$400Housing & Shelter$300Other$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$104
Median grant
1
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PASEO ARTS ASSOCIATION$5,000
CHRIST THE KING PARISH$1,520
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$104
PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART$100
Individual grant recipient$90
MUSEUM OF TULSA HISTORY$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%JOHN316 MISSION: $250 → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 8 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$21k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25’26
Food & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING PARISH
    5× · 2020–2026 · $11k
  • COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue -37%
  • SM
    SAN MIGUEL MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k

Funded once

  • TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • BM
    BREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +115%
  • TT
    THEATER TULSA
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
5
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
6
Chamber Music Tulsa

To share the experience of chamber music through live performance and community engagement

Arts & Culture
7
Ballet Oklahoma Inc

Okc ballet promotes the art of dance by supporting a professional company and its productions, operating a school of ballet for dance artists, children, and novice adults, and providing community engagement activities.

Arts & Culture
8
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
9
Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc

To provide nutritious meals, wellness checks and caring contact to elderly, disabled, and other homebound individuals in Tulsa and the surrounding areas. By combating the triple threats of aging - hunger, isolation, and loss of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
11
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
12
Oklahoma Contemporary Arts Center Inc

Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paseo Artists Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $15,000 · OtherTULSA AREA UNITED WAYCHRIST THE KING PARISH: $11,270 · OtherCHRIST THE KING PARISHBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED: $5,000 · OtherBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATEDPaseo Artists Association: $5,000 · OtherPaseo Artists Association+8 more: $3,204 · Other+8 moreCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $7,248 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BA…+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $240 · Arts & CultureJOHN 316 MISSION: $450 · Human ServicesTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $300 · Housing & Shelter
Other$39,474Food & Nutrition$7,348Arts & Culture$740Human Services$450Housing & Shelter$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $7,248 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $304 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $240 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles & Marion Weber FoundationOK13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barnett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barnett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barnett’s filings →

More from the funding graph