Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barbro Osher Pro Suecia Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
125
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$16MEducation$4.0MInternational$1.1MReligion$516kEnvironment$250kScience & Tech$213kRecreation & Sports$195kHuman Services$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 125 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $219k
  • $10k–50k79 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $650k
$12,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAIDEIA THE EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES IN SWEDEN$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
STIFTELSEN KULTURCENTRUM LJUSNARSBERG$90,000
AMERICAN SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
STIFTELSEN ULRIKSDALS SLOTTSTEATER CONFIDENCE$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
MARGARET JENKINS DANCE COMPANY$50,000
SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
AMERICAN SWEDISH HISTORICAL MUSEUM$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 37% of grant dollars ($9.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 63% that went abroad ($15M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $100k → 11%CONCORDIA LANGUAGE VILLAGES: $100k → 11%AMERICAN SWEDISH HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $45k → 22%SCANDINAVIAN SCHOOL: $250k → 10%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $60k → 20%ASTORIA NORDIC HERITAGE PARK: $50k → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY JACOB'S SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $50k → 18%NORDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM: $40k → 9%BISHOP HILL HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $50k → 9%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $40k → 14%THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%AMERICAN SWEDISH HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $40k → 22%SCANDINAVIAN SCHOOL IN SAN FRANCISCO: $40k → 10%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $60k → 20%BETHANY COLLEGE: $100k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $40k → 14%AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%AMERICAN SWEDISH HISTORY MUSEUM: $40k → 22%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $50k → 20%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $40k → 14%THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%AMERICAN SWEDISH HISTORY MUSEUM: $40k → 22%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC: $50k → 20%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $40k → 14%THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%AMERICAN SWEDISH HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $40k → 22%SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $40k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $40k → 14%AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%NORDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $598k → 9%AMERICAN SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%THE AMERICAN-SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%AMERICAN-SCANDANAVIAN FOUNDATION: $95k → 17%AMERICAN-SCANDANAVIAN FOUNDATION: $91k → 17%AMERICAN-SCANDANAVIAN FOUNDATION: $90k → 17%THE AMERICAN-SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION: $90k → 17%AMERICAN-SCANDANAVIAN FOUNDATION: $85k → 17%THE AMERICAN-SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION: $80k → 17%AMERICAN-SCANDANAVIAN FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%CAL PERFORMANCES: $75k → 10%AMERICAN SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%NORDIC CENTER AT UC BERKELEY: $1.0M → 10%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $100k → 10%MARAGRET JENKINS DANCE COMPANY: $45k → 10%MARGARET JENKINS DANCE COMPANY: $50k → 10%MARGARET JENKINS DANCE STUDIO: $50k → 10%OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ARTS AND HUMANITIES - DOMESTIC GRANTS PAYABLE: $215k → 10%OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ARTS AND HUMANITIES - DOMESTIC: $76k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 63% of all-years giving ($15M)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Sweden$15M · 672 grants
Germany$65k · 3 grants
France$43k · 3 grants
Italy$30k · 1 grant
Canada$25k · 1 grant
Denmark$12k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 200 repeat orgs$6.9M to everyone else

200 repeat relationships: 90 still active in FY2025, 110 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

200
236

Total granted

$17M
$6.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+22%

Still filing today

20%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $676k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The American-Scandinavian Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $891k · revenue +66%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $340k · revenue +74%
  • SA
    SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2018–2025 · $280k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORDIC CENTER AT UC BERKELEY
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • SS
    SCANDINAVIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $240k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
3
On the Boards

On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.

—
4
Vanguard Concerts
—
5
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
7
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
8
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
9
California Bach Society Inc

Choral Music Performances: California Bach Society is a 30-voice chamber choir known for finely wrought interpretations of Renaissance and Baroque music, often accompanied by leading period instrumentalists. Each season, the choir performs…

—
10
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
11
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
12
Midsummer Mozart Festival

The only music festival in North America dedicated to Mozart, our mission embraces both performance of highest artistic excellence and cultivation of new potential audience, including young people to assure the future appreciation of great…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Symphony; the most unlike its peers is Battery Park City Parks Conservancy Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 471 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/88
Grantees still filing
47/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORDIC CENTER AT UC BERKELEY: $1,000,000 · OtherNORDIC CENTER AT UC BERKELEYOTHER MISCELLANEOUS ARTS AND HUMANITIES - FOREIGN: $780,000 · OtherMILLESGARDEN: $600,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $566,675 · Other+164 more: $13,757,238 · Other+164 moreNational Nordic Museum: $808,447 · Arts & CultureNational Nordi…THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $340,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN S…SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $280,000 · Arts & CultureSWEDISH AMERIC…SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $185,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO …BISHOP HILL HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $128,500 · Arts & CultureSan Francisco Performances Inc: $101,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · Arts & CultureHEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+14 more: $610,800 · Arts & Culture+14 moreThe American-Scandinavian Foundation: $891,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF HOUSE OF SWEDEN: $50,000 · InternationalBETHANY COLLEGE: $190,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $130,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $69,500 · EducationDAG HAMMARSKJOLD FUND FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $49,500 · EducationSCANDINAVIAN SCHOOL IN SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 · EducationPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE: $37,000 · EducationThe Silent Film Festival: $80,000 · PhilanthropyCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $74,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$16,703,913Arts & Culture$2,653,747International$941,000Education$516,000Philanthropy$80,000Recreation & Sports$74,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe American-Scandinavian Foundation: $891,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetNational Nordic Museum: $808,447 over 7y, 19% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $340,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetSWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $280,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $220,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $190,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $185,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBISHOP HILL HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $128,500 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetSacred & Profane Chamber Chorus: $121,000 over 9y, 34% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Performances Inc: $101,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $100,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $88,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Silent Film Festival: $80,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetNEW YORK SCANDIA SYMPHONY: $76,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $74,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $69,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKronos Performing Arts Association: $55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $51,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOUSE OF SWEDEN: $50,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetMARGARET JENKINS DANCE STUDIO INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetDAG HAMMARSKJOLD FUND FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $49,500 over 8y, 17% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $41,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSCANDINAVIAN SCHOOL IN SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE: $37,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLINDSBORG OLD MILL AND SWEDISH HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $35,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetThe Cedar Cultural Center Inc: $29,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFrameline Inc: $28,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFoundation for the Future of Literature and Literacy dba Bay Area Book Festival: $25,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBIRGER SANDZEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The American-Scandinavian Foundation ↗
  • Who funds National Nordic Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP HILL HERITAGE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA27.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Bernard Osher Foundation · Phyllis C Wattis Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Fleishhacker Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Norway House Foundation co Royal Norwegian Consulate General

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barbro Osher Pro Suecia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barbro Osher Pro Suecia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • World Learning Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Worcester State Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Barbro Osher Pro Suecia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Barbro Osher Pro Suecia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 471 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barbro Osher Pro Suecia’s filings →

More from the funding graph