Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barbara Picasso Rex Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$136kEnvironment$85kHealth$76kCivil Rights$69kEducation$66kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL$8,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$8,000
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$8,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSUEM OF ART$8,000
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION$5,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC$3,000
GO2 FOR LUNG CANCER (FKA LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE)$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$2,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$2,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 22%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 22%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 22%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 22%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5k → 17%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 22%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5k → 17%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 22%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 22%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%PHILADELPHIA MUSUEM OF ART: $8k → 22%PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $5k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 7%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $10k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $6k → 17%GO2 FOUNDATION FOR LUNG CANCER (FKA LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE): $6k → 14%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $10k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $6k → 17%GO2 FOR LUNG CANCER (FKA LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE): $6k → 14%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $5k → 17%GO2 FOUNDATION FOR LUNG CANCER (FKA LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE): $5k → 14%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8k → 22%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $8k → 22%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $8k → 22%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $8k → 22%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8k → 22%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $8k → 22%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $8k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$350k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+17%

Still filing today

36%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    7× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +28%
  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +7%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +17%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
3
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
9
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
10
Arrow

To make grants to charitable organizations and programs that support the achievement of sexual and reproductive health (srh) of the poor & underprivileged women and others in the asia-pacific and elsewhere.

International
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
12
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People for the American Way; the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $66,000 · OtherGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOLTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $46,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ARTPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $35,000 · OtherPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAYMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $31,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $26,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $24,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAGO2 FOUNDATION FOR LUNG CANCER (FKA LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE): $18,000 · OtherGO2 FOUNDATION FOR LUNG CANCER (FKA LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE)+2 more: $18,000 · Other+2 morePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $58,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MU…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $19,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $17,000 · HealthPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil RightsFeeding America: $2,500 · Food & NutritionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$330,000Arts & Culture$58,000Environment$19,000Health$17,000Civil Rights$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Crime & Legal$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $58,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barbara Picasso Rex Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barbara Picasso Rex Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Barbara Picasso Rex Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Barbara Picasso Rex Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barbara Picasso Rex’s filings →

    More from the funding graph