Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barbara Goede Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Environment$706kFood & Nutrition$91kArts & Culture$88kAnimals$43kYouth Development$31kPhilanthropy$8kEducation$1k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $380
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
$31,620
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDENS$31,620
ESPANOLA VALLEY ANIMAL HUMANE$380
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GEORGIA O'KEEFE MUSEUM: $29k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY ANIMAL HUMANE: $25k → 18%ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROGRAM: $15k → 32%SANTA FE FARMERS MKT INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 18%SANTA FE FARMERS MKT INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY ANIMAL HUMANE: $4k → 18%GEORGIA O'KEEFE MUSEUM: $4k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 18%GEORGIA O'KEEFE MUSEUM: $4k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY ANIMAL HUMANE: $3k → 18%GEORGIA O'KEEFE MUSEUM: $4k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 18%GEORGIA O'KEEFE MUSEUM: $4k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 18%SANTA FE FARMERS MKT INSTITUTE: $2k → 12%ESPANOLA VALLEY ANIMAL HUMANE: $380 → 18%COOKING WITH KIDS INC: $30k → 12%WINGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 12%SF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%COOKING WITH KIDS INC: $4k → 12%COOKING WITH KIDS INC: $4k → 12%COOKING WITH KIDS INC: $4k → 12%SPANISH COLONIAL ARTS SOCIETY: $2k → 12%WINGS OF AMERICA: $2k → 12%EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS: $25k → 12%WINGS OF AMERICA: $2k → 12%EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS: $6k → 12%RENESAN INSTITUTE FOR LIFELONG LEARNING: $1k → 12%EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS: $3k → 12%WINGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 12%EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS: $3k → 12%WINGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 12%EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$942k · 12 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$942k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
0%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    COOKING WITH KIDS INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $42k · revenue +160%
  • ER
    EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +5%
  • KA
    KITCHEN ANGELS INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • ZY
    ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SC
    SF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • TS
    THE SPANISH COLONIAL ARTS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
2
El Museo Cultural De Santa Fe Inc

Mission is to promote, present and preserve hispanic arts & culture of nm. showcasing, encourging & supporting participation of hispanics in local arts economy; and presenting creative & cultural richness of our heritage, including arts &…

Arts & Culture
3
San Diego Historical Society

The mission of the san diego history center is to preserve our region's history - tell the diverse story of our region's past, present, and future; educate and enrich our community; and foster civic pride.

—
4
Casa Dolores Co Claudia Mclaughlin
Arts & Culture
5
National Institute of Mexican American History of Civil Rights
Civil Rights
6
National Institute of Flamenco

The mission of nif is to preserve and promote flamenco's artistry, history, and culture by presenting the finest flamenco in the world and by educating the american family in this art form while emphasizing the positive influence of art on…

Arts & Culture
7
New Mexico Acequia Association

To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.

Environment
8
San Francisco Basque Folkloric Groups
Arts & Culture
9
Cortez Center Inc Dba Cortez Cultural Center

The mission of the Cortez Cultural Center is to provide programs that enrich the lives of our community and its visitors by increasing cultural awareness, promoting the arts, and educating about the area's history, diversity and natural…

—
10
University of New Mexico Alumni Association

The alumni association is a vital partner in the continued excellence of the university of new mexico through the significant engagement of alumni. the alumni association's mission is to serve as a bridge between alumni and the university…

Education
11
Latino Center of Art and Culture

To foster the artistic, economic and cultural development of the chicano/latino community in the greater sacramento area by engaging the community in arts programming reflecting the chicano/latino experience.

Arts & Culture
12
Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Rancho De Las Golondrinas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Georgia O'keeffe Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN: $661,340 · EnvironmentSANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDENSF BOTANICAL GARDENS: $45,000 · OtherSF BOTANICAL GAR…ESPANOLA VALLEY ANIMAL HUMANE: $32,380 · OtherESPANOLA VALLEY …KITCHEN ANGELS INC: $25,000 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS I…ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROGRAM: $15,000 · OtherZUNI YOUTH ENRIC…SANTA FE FARMERS MKT INSTITUTE: $11,000 · OtherSANTA FE FARMERS…SF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,160 · OtherSF COMMUNITY FOU…+2 more: $3,500 · OtherGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $45,000 · Arts & CultureGEORGIA O…EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS INC: $38,000 · Arts & CultureEL RANCHO…+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCOOKING WITH KIDS INC: $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FOOD DEPOT: $13,000 · Human ServicesESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,000 · Animals
Environment$661,340Other$140,040Arts & Culture$85,000Youth Development$58,000Human Services$13,000Animals$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN: $661,340 over 7y, 38% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOOKING WITH KIDS INC: $42,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetEL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS INC: $38,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SPANISH COLONIAL ARTS SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENESAN INSTITUTE FOR LIFELONG LEARNING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds COOKING WITH KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds EL RANCHO DE LAS GOLONDRINAS INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SPANISH COLONIAL ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RENESAN INSTITUTE FOR LIFELONG LEARNING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barbara Goede Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barbara Goede Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Barbara Goede Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Barbara Goede Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barbara Goede’s filings →

    More from the funding graph