Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Barbara and Abraham Miller Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$875k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE BARBARA AND ABRAHAM MILLER FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARBARA AND ABRAHAM MILLER FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND$875,110
THE PARK SYNAGOGUE$250,000
JEWSIH MOTORCYCLIST ALLIANCE$25,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE$7,500
CLEVELAND HILLEL FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MENORAH PARK CENTER FOR SENIOR LIVING: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$471k · 8 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$471k
$253k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-21%
+4%

Still filing today

63%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $908k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PARK SYNAGOGUE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $263k
  • TL
    THE LILLIAN AND BETTY RATNER SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $93k
  • AE
    ANSHE EMETH BETH TEFILO CONGREGATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $56k

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RATNER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +4%
  • DC
    DOWNTOWN CLEVELAND ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +2%
  • JM
    JEWISH MOTORCYCLISTS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Fuchs Mizrachi Schools

The mission of fuchs mizrachi school is to educate each child in the orthodox jewish religious zionist tradition, imbued with the love of g-d, torah, people and the land of israel.

4
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
5
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
6
Madav Ix Foundation

Further the charitable, educational and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland (federation).

7
Commission On Cemetery Preservation

Further the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland including the preservation of jewish cemeteries

8
The Laura and Alvin Siegal College of Judaic Studies Educational Foundation

To carry out the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland by promoting high quality jewish life-long learning opportunities regarding the study of judaism spiritually, historically, culturally,…

Education
9
The Musical Arts Association

The Cleveland Orchestra inspires and enriches lives by creating extraordinary musical experiences at the highest level of artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
10
Ostara

To further the charitable, educational and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland ("federation").

Community Improvement
11
J David & Rebecca Heller Family Foundation

Further the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland ("federation").

Religion
12
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Menorah Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr19%29%35–55yr19%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr19%33%35–55yr19%62%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
1,299/9,797

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BARBARA AND ABRAHAM MILLER FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND — $875,110 · OtherBARBARA AND ABRAHAM MILLER FAMILY CHARITABLE FUNDPARK SYNAGOGUE — $263,000 · OtherPARK SYNAGOGUETHE LILLIAN AND BETTY RATNER SCHOOL — $92,984 · OtherTHE LILLIAN AND BETTY RATNER SCHOOLANSHE EMETH BETH TEFILO CONGREGATION — $55,930 · Other+18 more — $90,550 · Other+18 moreTHE RATNER SCHOOL — $200,000 · EducationTHE RATNER SCHO…NOTRE DAME COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationNOTRE DAME COLL…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $75,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage — $17,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,000 · Arts & CultureDOWNTOWN CLEVELAND ALLIANCE — $12,500 · Community ImprovementGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL — $2,500 · ReligionJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,800 · International
Other$1,377,574Education$235,000Philanthropy$85,500Arts & Culture$22,500Community Improvement$12,500Religion$2,500International$1,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE RATNER SCHOOL — $200,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $18,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage — $17,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN CLEVELAND ALLIANCE — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ARTS-INSPIRED LEARNING — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENORAH PARK FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO CURLING CLUB — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENORAH PARK CENTER FOR SENIOR LIVING — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family FoundationOH24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Cleveland Foundation · The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation · The Miller Family Foundation · Marla & Joseph Shafran Foundation · James and Susan Ratner Family Foundation · Samuel H & Maria Miller Foundation · Ronald and Deborah Ratner Family Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Esther and Hyman Rapport Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Barbara and Abraham Miller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Barbara and Abraham Miller Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Barbara and Abraham Miller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph