Skip to content
The Bansal Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Bansal Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$384k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$313k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$634kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kArts & Culture$22kInternational$21kPhilanthropy$12kYouth Development$11kEducation$10kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
  • $250k+1 grant · $313k
$10,571
Median grant
4
States reached
$562k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAJASTHAN MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (RAJMAA)$313,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,500
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$14,000
RAISING AWARENESS OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH AUTISM INC$12,535
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$10,571
ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA$5,000
PALM BEACH INDIA ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
JUPITER TEQUESTA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$1,000
WELLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
INDIAN RELIGIOUS & CULTURE CENTER OF FLORIDA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA: $5k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $21k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
UT
KY
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$689k · 8 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$689k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2023–2024 · $41k · revenue +22%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $33k · revenue +27%
  • RA
    RAISING AWARENESS OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH AUTISM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $28k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • M
    MOCAAPI
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -25%
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -61%
  • WF
    WORLDWIDE FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ananta Giving Foundation

To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…

Philanthropy
2
Indo-Us Foundation

The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.

Human Services
3
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Ignite Asha

Improve the human rights and self worth of south asian women and children on a global level.

International
5
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
7
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
8
Wadhwani Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Viju & Asha Charitable Foundation
—
10
Divyajyot Foundation Inc

Providing medical services to needy in india.

Religion
11
Samjivani Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Maya Advani Family Foundation Ltd
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Indian Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Worldwide Friends Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAJASTHAN MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (RAJMAA): $552,000 · OtherRAJASTHAN MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (RAJMAA)+10 more: $28,347 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,500 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $33,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRAISING AWARENESS OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH AUTISM INC: $27,535 · HealthMOCAAPI: $11,000 · HealthPALM BEACH INDIA ASSOCIATION INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureUS INDIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $20,571 · Food & NutritionWORLDWIDE FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$580,347Human Services$45,500Philanthropy$43,000Health$38,535Arts & Culture$21,500Food & Nutrition$20,571Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $33,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAISING AWARENESS OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH AUTISM INC: $27,535 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $20,571 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOCAAPI: $11,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUS INDIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDIAMOND DERBY INC BARNSTABLE BROWN PARTY: $9,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWellington Community Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetJUPITER TEQUESTA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION I: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NYC INC: $675 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $642 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bansal Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bansal Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bansal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home