Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bailey Wildlife Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$419k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$3.3MEnvironment$779kScience & Tech$258kYouth Development$82kHealth$78kEducation$60k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$72,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Redwood Parks Conservancy$134,900
The Memphis Zoo$80,428
Geoversity Foundation$72,000
BEACHWOOD CENTER FOR WELLBEING$71,843
USM Foundation Inc$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Marine Biological library: $80k → 8%Geoversity Foundation: $72k → 11%Redwood Parks Conservancy: $160k → 17%ZSL AMERICA INC: $200k → 17%ARCI - Carribean Raptor Study: $5k → 19%The Memphis Zoo: $100k → 17%BEACHWOOD CENTER FOR WELLBEING: $72k → 7%Shore Rivers - pollutants discharge: $58k → 10%USM Foundation Inc: $697k → 11%Biodiversity Reasearch Institute: $55k → 7%Forest Society of Maine: $125k → 15%Downeast Salmon Federation: $77k → 16%Marine Biological library: $80k → 8%Geoversity Foundation: $10k → 11%Redwood Parks Conservancy: $135k → 17%ZSL AMERICA INC: $100k → 17%The Memphis Zoo: $80k → 17%BEACHWOOD CENTER FOR WELLBEING: $7k → 7%USM Foundation Inc: $500k → 11%Biodiversity Reasearch Institute: $26k → 7%Forest Society of Maine: $500 → 15%Downeast Salmon Federation: $50k → 16%Marine Biological library: $78k → 8%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%Redwood Parks Conservancy: $75k → 17%USM Foundation Inc: $468k → 11%BRI - Block Island Raptor tracking: $20k → 7%Forest Society of Maine: $250 → 15%Downeast Salmon-Smelt Brook Dam rem: $38k → 16%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%Redwood Parks Conservancy: $20k → 17%USM Foundation Inc: $440k → 11%BRI - Caribbean Raptor Study: $15k → 7%Downeast Salmon- Fish Ladder: $25k → 16%Redwood Parks Conservancy: $10k → 17%USM Foundation Inc: $400k → 11%Biodiversity Reasearch Institute: $8k → 7%Downeast Salmon Federation: $10k → 16%USM Foundation Inc: $60k → 11%Biodiversity Reasearch Institute: $8k → 7%Univ of Maryland-Artificial oyster: $30k → 11%Univ of Maryland-Micro plastic poll: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
NY
MA
RI
CA
MD
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 12 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$4.3M
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-20%

Still filing today

75%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    REDWOOD PARKS CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $400k · revenue +90%
  • MZ
    Memphis Zoological Society
    2× · 2022–2024 · $180k · revenue +24%
  • DOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $137k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • MC
    Montana Council of Trout Unlimited
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • SR
    Shore Rivers - pollutants discharge
    one grant, 2018 · $58k
  • DS
    Downeast Salmon-Smelt Brook Dam rem
    one grant, 2018 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
3
Endangered Species International

Endangered Species International is strongly committed to reversing the trend of human-induced species extinction, saving endangered animals, and preserving wild places.

Animals
4
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
5
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
6
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
9
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
10
Waterbird Society

The waterbird society is composed of biologists, researchers, conservationists, students, and others interested in the behavior, ecology, and conservation of waterbirds. the organization is administered by officers and council members…

—
11
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
12
Wild Earth Society Incorporated

Wildlands Network works to reconnect, restore and rewild North America so that life-in all its diversity-can thrive.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Zoological Society; the most unlike its peers is Beachwood Center for Wellbeing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USM Foundation Inc: $2,565,000 · OtherUSM Foundation IncMarine Biological library: $238,408 · OtherMarine Biological library+13 more: $403,850 · Other+13 moreZSL AMERICA INC: $300,000 · AnimalsZSL AMERICA INCMemphis Zoological Society: $180,428 · AnimalsMemphis Zoologic…DOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION: $137,000 · AnimalsDOWNEAST SALMON …ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $50,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIE…REDWOOD PARKS CONSERVANCY: $399,900 · EnvironmentREDWOOD PARKS C…Forest Society of Maine: $125,750 · EnvironmentForest Society …BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $96,060 · EnvironmentBIODIVERSITY RE…+1 more: $250 · EnvironmentBEACHWOOD CENTER FOR WELLBEING: $78,477 · Health
Other$3,207,258Animals$667,428Environment$621,960Health$78,477

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREDWOOD PARKS CONSERVANCY: $399,900 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetZSL AMERICA INC: $300,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetMemphis Zoological Society: $180,428 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION: $137,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetForest Society of Maine: $125,750 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $96,060 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetGeoversity Foundation: $81,750 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetBEACHWOOD CENTER FOR WELLBEING: $78,477 over 2y, 13% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE WILDERNESS WATERSHED TRUST INC DBA PIERCE POND WATERSHED TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REDWOOD PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ZSL AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds DOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Forest Society of Maine ↗
  • Who funds BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Geoversity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BEACHWOOD CENTER FOR WELLBEING ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds MAINE WILDERNESS WATERSHED TRUST INC DBA PIERCE POND WATERSHED TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bailey Wildlife Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bailey Wildlife Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bailey Wildlife Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bailey Wildlife Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bailey Wildlife’s filings →

    More from the funding graph