Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Austin & Gabriela Hearst Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$560k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$4.2MPhilanthropy$4.0MHealth$1.9MEducation$1.9MInternational$1.2MScience & Tech$905kEnvironment$625kPublic Benefit$455kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$188k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIONEER WORKS$560,000
CENTER FOR CONSCIOUSNESS MEDICINE$317,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$250,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$225,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$173,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$150,000
BRAINFUTURES$125,000
THE 1440 FOUNDATION SARATOGA$120,000
FRIENDS OF THE MUSEE DES ARTS$110,000
HOPEWELL FUND$100,000
PSYCHEDELIC SCIENCE FUNDERS$100,000
APOLLO PACT INC$99,999
THE FRIENDS OF MCGILL ADVISORS INC$66,666
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$50,000
HEALING ADVOCACY FUND$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT: $25k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.4M · 22 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
40

Total granted

$9.4M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+27%

Still filing today

73%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PANORAMA GLOBAL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $465k · revenue +50%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2017–2025 · $435k · revenue +58%
  • AP
    Apollo Pact Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +54% · 49% of their budget

Funded once

  • UA
    USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • HH
    HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +77%
  • WH
    WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Now Project; the most unlike its peers is Rebecoming Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/56
Grantees still filing
36/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $954,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPSFC (PSYCHEDELIC SCIENCE FUNDERS COLLABORATIVE): $805,000 · OtherPSFC (PSYCHEDELIC SCIENCE FUNDERS C…DON BOSCO CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $498,000 · OtherDON BOSCO CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOLAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $250,000 · OtherBLUE SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherFAIR DEMOCRACY: $300,000 · OtherFAIR DEMOCRACYBROWN UNIVERSITY: $250,050 · Other+39 more: $2,067,058 · Other+39 moreROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $3,460,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY AD…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $357,792 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AM…HOPEWELL FUND: $225,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND+2 more: $106,000 · PhilanthropyPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $2,952,500 · Arts & CulturePIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDA…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $435,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF A…+6 more: $353,620 · Arts & Culture+6 moreGATHER WELL PSCHEDELICS INC: $1,142,000 · HealthGATHER WELL…Apollo Pact Inc: $149,999 · HealthApollo Pact…BRAINFUTURES INCORPORATED: $125,000 · HealthBRAINFUTURE…Fireside Project Inc: $100,000 · HealthFireside Pr…REBECOMING INC: $100,000 · HealthREBECOMING …+2 more: $55,000 · HealthSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $200,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $200,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $83,333 · EducationThe New School: $75,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationTHE PARIS REVIEW FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $33,333 · Education+2 more: $14,500 · EducationPANORAMA GLOBAL: $465,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $135,000 · InternationalHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $125,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $50,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $525,000 · EnvironmentAMAZON FRONTLINES: $50,000 · EnvironmentSOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Environment
Other$5,374,268Philanthropy$4,148,792Arts & Culture$3,741,120Health$1,671,999Education$836,166International$785,000Environment$625,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $3,460,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $2,952,500 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetGATHER WELL PSCHEDELICS INC: $1,142,000 over 6y, 72% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $525,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $465,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $435,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $357,792 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR DEMOCRACY: $300,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $250,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SCHOOL: $250,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $225,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetApollo Pact Inc: $149,999 over 2y, 49% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $135,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAINFUTURES INCORPORATED: $125,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $125,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $105,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFireside Project Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREBECOMING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $97,826 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $83,333 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP NOW PROJECT: $80,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetThe New School: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSERPENTINE AMERICAS FOUNDATION FKA AMERICAS FOUNDATION OF THE SERPENTINE GA: $66,195 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCFDA FOUNDATION INC: $56,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE PARIS REVIEW FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSave the Children Action Network: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ARCHER GROUP: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetHealing Advocacy Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCapital for Good USA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $47,425 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $33,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPENSECRETS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHISTORIC DISTRICTS COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF INTEGRAL STUDIES: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GATHER WELL PSCHEDELICS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FAIR DEMOCRACY ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Apollo Pact Inc ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAINFUTURES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Fireside Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds REBECOMING INC ↗
  • Who funds INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP NOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Simon Family Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Jewish Communal Fund · The San Diego Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tides Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Austin & Gabriela Hearst Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Austin & Gabriela Hearst Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Austin & Gabriela Hearst Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Austin & Gabriela Hearst Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Austin & Gabriela Hearst’s filings →

More from the funding graph